My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2005-03-14
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009 partial
>
2005
>
AgdaPkt 2005-03-14
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/16/2012 4:53:55 PM
Creation date
3/10/2005 4:10:53 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Date
3/14/2005
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
239
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
� �� ^�3 <br /> ATTACHMENT 7 <br /> Wiilinm & Jnnine Lepe <br /> 3729 Lnurel Way <br /> Redwood City, CA 94062 <br /> Phone: 650-365-0890 <br /> February 23, 2005 . <br /> Ms. Jill Ekas, Senior Planner <br /> Redwood City — Planning Services <br /> 1017 Middlefield Rd. <br /> Redwood City, CA 94063 <br /> Re: Laurel Way — Confirmation of City Council Policy <br /> Dear Ms. Ekas: <br /> We will be unable to attend the City Council meeting on February 28�' to discuss the Council <br /> policy in regard to development of Laurel Way. However, we would like to register the <br /> following comments with you. <br /> 1. The map of Laurel Way included with your notice is incorrect. The "City Standard <br /> Paved" section of the street ends between 3725 and 3729 Laurel Way. Laurel Way is <br /> "Substandard Paved" from 3729 Laurel Way to the end. <br /> Therefore, since you are using the paving standazds to establish the EIR — No EIR line, <br /> the properties at 3718 and 3724 Laurel Way should also be required to file an <br /> Environmental Impact Report. <br /> 2. Although we are not familiar with any plans for building on 3730 Laurel, we feel that if <br /> an exception is made for this pazcel it will set a precedent for developers of every other <br /> pazcel on the street. For example, if no EIR was required for 3730 Laurel Way why <br /> should 3734 Laurel Way be required to provide one. T'hen it would be 3738, 3742 and <br /> 3748 Laurel Way. <br /> Thank you for the opportunity to express our �omments. <br /> Sincerel�, , � � <br /> .,` 7 � � <br /> (, � , _i <br /> t � �'L: ' �! -i,�1 �!".'.'G � � c , - c , .- � « i —j � <br /> .�. <br /> William & Janine Lep_,;� <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.