CC Min 1985-10-14 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

10. Report re proposed Nuisance Abatement, dilapidated building - 851 Brewster (market building) (public hearing held 8/26/85) (702 -11) Report of City Manager and Chief Building Official 9/26/85 In response to question, City Attorney Sch ricker noted that at the August 26, 1985 meeting, when the public hearing on the subject proposed Nuisance Abatement was held, the proposed resolution failed on a tie roll call vote. He said that if a public nuisance abatement is proposed again, the finding must be something that the courts would support such as factors endangering life, health, public welfare, etc. Mr. Schricker noted that the recurring nature of a nuisance is grounds for support of abatement proceedings which can be reinstituted after inspection and a reasonable review period. M /S: Chandler /Mosher that staff be directed to watch the building at 851 Brewster closely for evidence of further deterioration and possible nuisance abatement and also that a committee be formed of Council representatives and the property owners to explore possible uses of the site. Carried unanimously by voice vote. MINUTE ORDER NO. 85 -156 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 11. Report re proposed financing of Transportation Study for Redwood Peninsula (702 -02) Report of Community Development Director to City Manager 10/4/85 Information item. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 12. Proposed Willow Street Assessment District (407 -04) Report of City Manager 9/30/85 In response to question, Community Development Director Schroeter reported that Daniel and John Beltramo support the assessment district and have done all possible to have it formed, and that he believes they should be permitted to proceed with the parking lot at 520 Willow Street without the condition placed on their Architectural Permit requiring initiation of assessment district proceedings. M /S: Rhodes /Bury to reverse the prior decision to proceed with an assessment district on Willow Street, allow the Beltramo's to proceed with the parking lot for which they have Architectural Permit, and to look for other alternatives with regard to street improvements. John Beltramo, stated that he owns 32% of the frontage and agreed to the proposed assessment district and are willing to pay their portion in cash for the improvements on Willow Street, but they do not believe they should pay for all the needed improvements on the street. The motion carried unanimously by voice vote. MINUTE ORDER NO. 85 -157 MINUTE BOOK NO. 46 Page No. 72 Reg.Mtg. 10/14/85 Page 7