Laserfiche WebLink
INFORMATION REQUESTED ON POLYSTYRENE PROBLEMS IN STORM WATER <br /> The California Integrated Waste Management The NewPoint Group will prepare a report on <br /> Board, through its consultant the NewPoint polystyrene as part of a broader "Plastics White <br /> Group, is requesting information from cities, Paper" that will address the use, recycling, and <br /> counties and interested parties on the problems disposal of plastics. Agencies with information on <br /> associated with polystyrene in storm water. The the problems associated with polystyrene in storm <br /> Board has also scheduled a workshop water are urged to contact Wendy Pratt of the <br /> on polystyrene and other plastics in the entire NewPoint Group at wendypratt@newpointgroup.com <br /> waste stream, to be held on June 24-25 at Cai/EPA or 916-442-0508 extension 6. <br /> Headquarters. <br /> Information about the workshop will be avail- <br /> The study was required by SB 1127 (Karnette - able on the board's website at www. ciwmb.ca.gov <br /> Long Beach), enacted in 2001, The bill initially about ten to fifteen days prior to the event, In <br /> proposed a ten-year phase-out of polystyrene as a order for the contractor to incorporate information <br /> source control measure to assist in storm water from the workshop, the draft report will likely not <br /> cleanup statewide. The bill evolved into a require- be available until early September. <br /> ment that the state study of the effects of poly- <br /> styrene cups and food containers in storm water <br /> following opposition from industry representa- <br /> tives. <br /> <br /> Legislative Bill Action <br /> <br /> The following are summaries of just a few of the legislative bills that are currently being acted upon by the <br /> League of California Cities. The League encourages you to review the bills on its Web site at www. cacities, org/ <br /> legtracking and contact the appropriate committees to demonstrate )'our support or opposition of issues. <br /> Your assistance is appreciated. <br /> <br />TRANSPORTATION AND PUBLIC WORKS difficult for a public agency to successfully argue. <br /> Staff: Natasha Fooman, Status: SenFIr, Position: <br />SB 14~1~ (Alarcon). Contracts for Labor or Oppose. <br />Services. SB 1466 exposes public agencies to <br />civil penalties and undermines an agency's confi- ACA 11 (Richman). InFrastructure. Fi- <br />dence in determining the lowest responsible nance. A{;A 11 goes a long way toward decreas- <br />bidder. This bill implies that any entity that lng the year-to-year funding uncertainties that <br />enters into a labor contract for construction, impede long-term planning and implementation of <br />.janitorial or security guard services, should know infrastructure construction, maintenance and <br />if the contract does not provide sufficient funds rehabilitation. Bbeginning in FY 04-05, this bill <br />to allow the contractor to comply with all labor would dedicate a percentage of the growth of the <br />laws and regulations. Additionally, SB 1466 General Fund to meet California's infrastructure <br />establishes a rebuttable presumption that the needs. These funds would be used to meet trans- <br />entity entering into a contract for labor or ser- portation, education, water, and park and open <br />vices does not violate the provisions of this bill if space needs across California. In each category, <br />the contract contains comprehensive information 50 percent would be available for state projects <br />about the contractor and it's workforce. This and 50% for local projects. Additionally, ACA 11 <br />rebuttable presumption would be extremely provides flexibility by allowing entities receiving <br /> <br /> PAGE 6/PRIORITY FOCUS Visit the League's Official Web Site--www. cacities.org <br /> <br /> <br />