My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2002-06-03
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009 partial
>
2002
>
AgdaPkt 2002-06-03
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/5/2005 2:53:12 PM
Creation date
5/31/2002 9:02:34 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Agency Type
City Council
Date
6/3/2002
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
108
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Legislative Bill Action <br /> <br />distributions from the infrastructure fund to existing display, so there would not be an increase <br />exchange these funds with other entities for the in advertising displays. The League supports this <br />purpose of exchanging eligible funds in one measure based on existing policy to support the <br />category for those in another. Staff: Natasha authority of cities to regulate billboards and other <br />Fooman, Status: AsmFIr, Position: Support. signage. Staff: Natasha Fooman, Status: AsmFIr, <br /> Position: Support. <br />AB 2333 (Nakano). Transportation Fund- <br />ing. AB 2333 was amended on May 16; it autho- AB 1839 (Campbell). Indemnity. Public <br />rizes the Southern California Association of Gov- Agency. Amendments were taken on AB 1839, <br />ernments to review the master plans and airport but they did not alleviate our concerns with this <br />layout plans of each commercial airport or pro- bill. AB 1839 limits the conditions under which a <br />posed airport in Los Angeles, Orange, San Bernar- design professional would be required to indem- <br />dino and Riverside counties in order to determine nify a public agency to negligence and willful <br />whether each airport is in compliance or is taking misconduct (the normal tort rule), and hence <br />the necessary steps to achieve compliance with provides for no indemnification. AB 1839 further <br />the Regional 'Transportation Plan. Even with the limits the indemnity of the public agency to <br />May 16 amendments, AB 2333 continues to assert causation arising from action "in the performance <br />that communities should conform to a document of the agreement or contract". This would allow <br />designed to be used for planning purposes onlyl the design professional an additional loophole <br />Regional Transportation Plans are designed to with which to avoid indemnifying and defending a <br />guide transportation improvements and to help public agency, by stating that a particular action <br />cities, counties and others plan for the future; was not "in the performance of the contract/' <br />they are intended to force cities and counties to Finally, while AB 1839 does not specifically state <br />build or not build what is contained within them, that it affects design-build contracts, it would bar <br />Additionally, AB 2333's use of a "fair share" public agencies, on design-build pro~ects where <br />distribution ignores market factors such as conve- the architectural and engineering firm is also <br />nience, proximity to roads and rail, and personal doing the construction, from obtaining the broad <br />preference. Adherence to a-"fair share" distribu- indemnity protection normally recommended form <br />tion is not the appropriate gauge for where construction contractors. The League believes that <br />facilities should be located, Staff: Natasha existing statutory requirements agreed upon by <br />Fooman, Status: AsmFIr. Position: Oppose. local government and design professionals in <br /> Chapter 722, Statutes of 1997 (AB 994) are <br />AB 2087 (0ropeza). Outdoor Advertising. sufficient protection for both local agencies and <br />AB 2087 expands existing redevelopment area the design professional. Staff: Natasha Fooman, <br />advertising display exemptions from the Outdoor Status: SenJud;Hrg-6/4, Position: Oppose. <br />advertising Act to apply to any redevelopment <br />agency and expands the exemption period from 10 ENVIRONMENTAL <br />to 20 years. Additionally; this bill allows local <br />governments the ability to authorize a display if it AB 2351 (Canciamilla). Water Ouality. <br />would not result in a concentration of displays Mandatory Minimum Penalties. AB 2351 <br />that will have a negative impact on the safety or (Canciamilla), co-sponsored by the League and the <br />aesthetic quality. Any advertising display autho- California Association of Sanitation Agencies, <br />rized under AB 2087 requires the removal of an unanimously passed off the Assembly Appropria- <br /> <br />Visit the League's'Official Web Site--www. cacities.org PRIORITY FOCUS/PAGE 7 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.