My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2002-06-03
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009 partial
>
2002
>
AgdaPkt 2002-06-03
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/5/2005 2:53:12 PM
Creation date
5/31/2002 9:02:34 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Agency Type
City Council
Date
6/3/2002
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
108
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
· Two "fan" type pole banners (totaling 154 square feet). <br />· Window signage (totaling 168 square feet). <br />Site signage totals 638 square feet. The site is allowed a maximum total area of 225 <br />square feet (per the Sign Ordinance). <br /> <br />Analysis <br />The Sign Ordinance allows up to fifteen (15) feet in height for freestanding signs <br />(Sec. 3. 79c). The Ordinance further states that if certain findings can be determined, an <br />exception can be made and up to 24 feet in height can be allowed with the following <br />criteria: <br />· "The proposed sign is part of or incorporates an architectural feature such as a tower <br />or spire that enhances the design of the project." The ARC felt that this pole sign did not <br />meet the criteria for an exception, plus, according to Section 3.79 of the Sign Ordinance, <br />the freestanding sign exceeds the parameter of the height exception by two feet (see <br />attachment 3). <br />· The sign would qualify to be forwarded to the Historical Resources Advisory Committee <br /> (HRAC) to seek a classification as an historic sign (Sec. 3.132) based upon the <br /> following findings: <br /> 1. The sign was installed prior to 1950 and/or reflect unique historical characteristics of <br /> the development and heritage of Redwood City; <br /> 2. The sign reflects exemplary technology, craftsmanship or design of the time period <br /> in which it was built; <br /> 3. The sign is in architectural harmony with buildings on the property; and <br /> 4. The sign is structurally sound and complies with the requirements of the Sign <br /> Ordinance. <br />The ARC could not make any findings to justify the forwarding of this application to the <br />HRAC. Therefore, the ARC determined that the subject nonconforming sign be amortized <br />for the seven-year period, with a removal date of June, 2006. <br /> <br />The ARC recommended that the owners consider replacement signage that conforms to <br />the current standards of the Sign Ordinance (such as a six to eight foot high monument <br />sign). The ARC explained that tall freestanding signs are typically only allowed on business <br />sites located immediately adjacent to freeways (where longer vistas and high vehicle <br />speeds occur). Monument signs are allowed on commercial corridors (such as Broadway) <br />and typically incorporate landscaping. <br /> <br />Alternative <br />Allow the nonconforming freestanding sign to stand as an exception. However, this <br />decision would serve as a precedent for the review and approval of future sign applications <br />for exceptions and affect subsequent enforcement efforts to remove these types of signs. <br /> <br />Fiscal Impact <br />None. <br /> <br />Conclusion <br />In order to achieve continuity and maintain a basis for code enforcement of the Sign <br />Ordinance, a determination qualifying the level of exceptions granted by the ARC needs to <br />be demonstrated. The confirmation of the Architectural Review Committee's findings in <br />this case will reflect this. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.