CC Min 1985-07-01 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

Oral Communications Item No. 1 (continued) City Manager Smith advised that the perception that fire Redwood Shores is insufficient is not correct; that it is fact, in some cases better than, other protection in time and a half to provide the special service; that the as good as, and in contract with the Belmont Fire Protection of Redwood City; that it costs Redwood Shores; that the service has been provided to re is a substantial ion District to provide service to that it is an unnecessary expense. them in the past, but Discussion followed regarding the danger of fireworks; h cities ban all fireworks, aril wh vulnerable than Redwood Shoresether Emerald Hills area i f is mo adjacent re M /S: Claire /Bury that the City again station a fire engine Shores area for the July 4th holiday. g ne in the Redwood The motion carried by the following roll call vote: Ayes: Bury, Chandler, Claire, Rhodes and Mayor Britsch 9i Noes: Stangel ----- - - - - -- MINUTE ORDER NO. 85 -94 2. Winnie Brown, 3015 E. ---------------------------------- requested Council assistanc e r regarding a the r 5 V g e the Rent Stud ase re ent Park, St udy Committee, stating that the owner r of e the park had a to refund the excess security deposits coverin Y pported by retaining the most recent month 9 a period hs, but of three mont not believe this was fair, at the increased rental rate She also reported that two of the parks hreceived their notices of rent increases early in June April 30, 1985 of 4. Harbor Village received their notices on 4% increase. � which was based on the CPI of June 28, which was based on the February 1985 rate of 5 referred to the lease agreement which states that the late avai lable will be used to co •5% increase. She believe this is a used the annual increase st information management co Y he advised that they had contacted therefore amount of the increase. their asked that Council which no intention of changin the help them, g Brief discussion by Council followed, and in re 1 Britschgi, City Attorney Schricker indicated that y the City h a s b involvement in the case. Y Mayor Chairman of the Housing and Committee City has no official 9 advised that he will contact the matter. a to look into the -------------------------------- - - - - -- MEMO 7/10/85 3• Darlene Pre sotto ----------------------------------- 221 Howland Street, reported that they recently discovered that their fence, separating their property from whip l down, and a two -feet deep trench du having been applied for b g� apparently without a Lodge, has been torn building a cinder block wa het owner of Whipple Lodge for the bu out and halted the work because there was no 9� a car had become stuck t the open a Building Inspector had come permit; and that on Saturday evening, truck to pull him out p trench, and rather than call a out of the ditch and , the driver of the car had driven at high speed is no longer a fence torseparaterthe�rtpropert The are concerned that there from m that of Whipple Lodge. Reg. Mtg. 7/1/85 Page 3 MINUTE BOOK NO. 45 Page No. 497