CC Min 1984-06-11 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

Resident, 62 Tum Suden Way, Woodside, said that the proposed development would be on a blind corner where a dangerous traffic situation exists. He said the area is rural and he is opposed to introducing cluster housing there and also objects to removal of trees. Tom Knapp, 70 Tum Suden Way, Woodside, endorsed the comments of the previous speaker and suggested landslide problems also might exist because of the steep slopes. A.W. Maguire, 988 Godetia Way, Woodside, across from the proposed development, expressed concern about the additional traffic problems a 19 -unit development would bring, noting that Woodside has a one -acre minimum lot size in the adjacent area and four or five homes might be acceptable on the site. Mr. Maguire questioned whether the developer has obtained a necessary sewer connection easement from the Elks Club. He suggested the developer could give the top six acres to an open space district and use the lower part for four or five homes on one -acre lots. Geri Mayers, 170 Woodside Drive, Woodside, inquired if adequate police and fire protection from Redwood City would be available. It was explained that the City could service the area. Robert Sturm, 4149 Jefferson, adjacent to the property, objected to development because of the steepness of the site, the increase in traffic and the loss of trees. David Silverman, 844 West California Way, adjacent to the site, said the dangerous traffic situation is his main concern as there is no room on the streets for additional cars. Tom Adams, attorney representing some neighbors of the site who support the Planning Commission decision, said that the developer has the flexibility to return with another application presenting a plan responding to the Planning Commission concerns stated in the Minutes. Mr. Adams said the neighbors would prefer development consistent with the surrounding area and urged the Council to uphold the decision of the Planning Commission. In response to question, Mr. Adams said he does not know of any open space district or foundation which might be willing to purchase some of the property for that purpose. Philip Forsyth, 1104 Godetia, Woodside, said he has had considerable unfortunate experience as a result of the existing traffic hazards and opposes the development. James Rafferty, 1000 Godetia, Woodside, also commented on dangerous traffic conditions and said he opposes any realignment of Godetia. Resident, 998 Lakeview, noted dangerous traffic conditions which exist and the rural character of the neighborhood in opposing development. Minutes 6/11/84 Page 6 MINUTE BOOK NO. 45 Page No. 47