My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
CC Min 1984-06-11
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Minutes
>
1980-1989
>
1984
>
CC Min 1984-06-11
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/4/2011 1:33:13 PM
Creation date
3/18/2005 3:35:25 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Minutes
Date
6/11/1984
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF REDWOOD CITY PROVIDING FOR THE APPLICATION OF THE <br />VEHICLE CODE TO CERTAIN PRIVATE PROPERTY PURSUANT TO VEHICLE CODE SECTION <br />21107.7 approved for first reading <br />carried unanimously by roll call vote. <br />Councilman Chandler requested that a brief Police report on results be given <br />to Council within about three months, since furnishing police service to a <br />private residential area is setting a precedent in the City. <br />(MEMO 6/18/84 <br />---------------------------------------------------------------------------- - - - - -- <br />3. Public Hearing - Appeal from the denial by the Planning <br />Commission of application for Planned Development <br />Permit to construct 19 dwellings on 10.602 acre parcel <br />4155 Jefferson Avenue - Emerald Highlands, Omni <br />Resources Corporation, appellant (203 -10) <br />Planning Commission record transmitted 5/29/84 <br />Final Environmental Impact Report October 1983 <br />Affidavits of Publication of Notice of Hearing and of Mailing on file. <br />Planning Director Schroeter presented the Appeal, stating that the appellant <br />filed a preliminary Planned Development Permit (PDP) Application for a <br />development whose entrance would be in Woodside and that the Planning <br />Commission had unanimously denied it as presented. <br />In response to questions, Mr. Schroeter described the steep site and said <br />that cluster development with fewer units, leaving the steepest parts of the <br />site undeveloped had been suggested to the developer. <br />Mayor Britschgi declared the Public Hearing open at 8:29 p.m. <br />Bob Radcliffe, 390 South San Antonio Road, Los Altos, one of the property <br />owners, said he believes the property could accommodate 21 units, but he is <br />not opposed to reducing the number of units requested in the application. <br />Mr. Radcliffe said his design was not specific, but merely intended to <br />indicate how units might be accommodated, noting that the top of the hill is <br />flat and houses could be built there. <br />David Takamoto, 80 South Market Street, San Jose, architect representing the <br />property owners, stated that he had commenced with 23 units and reduced the <br />numbers to 19 in order to solve problems presented by the steepness of the <br />site. Mr. Takamoto said that a Planned Unit Development (PUD) was desired so <br />that the houses could be placed in the best locations rather than on "cookie <br />cutter" lots. <br />Ruth Ledbetter, 722 Southview Way, Woodside, neighbor of the property, said <br />that she opposes the development because of her concern about the traffic <br />situation at that part of Jefferson. <br />Minutes <br />6/11/84 <br />Page 5 <br />NO. 45 <br />Page No. 46 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.