My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2005-04-25
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009 partial
>
2005
>
AgdaPkt 2005-04-25
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/5/2005 3:01:42 PM
Creation date
4/21/2005 4:08:31 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Date
4/25/2005
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
270
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />gð.~ <br /> <br />Chair Paulson said in order to do the conversion they could not meet their open <br />space requirements, and there was no request at the time for a variance, <br />because it was just a study session. <br /> <br />Ms. Ekas said the City Code is very restrictive about Condo Conversions, and <br />how they need to meet the minimum standards. She said a Planned <br />Development Permit doesn't allow for deviations in Open Space or Parking <br />Requirements, so it gets reviewed from two different angles: one is in the Muni <br />Code in the Subdivision Ordinance, and the other is in Article 46 of the Zoning <br />Ordinance. <br /> <br />Commissioner Claire asked that if the Planning Commission chose not to <br />eliminate the 9th unit, could a variance be granted and approved by the City <br />Council. His said his concern is increasing rather than decreasing the housing <br />stock. <br /> <br />Principal Planner Passanisi said he didn't believe that it allows for a variance. He <br />said the Planning Oevelopment Permit or Condo Permit has to conform to the <br />Zoning Ordinance, and if it doesn't, and the Commission denies this project, or <br />wishes to retain the 9th unit, they could appeal the decision to the City Council to <br />allow the retention of the 9th unit. <br /> <br />Mr. Brower said Section 30.138 of the Redwood City Municipal Code regarding <br />variances. lists several findings that the Planning Commission would have to <br />make if the Planning Commission chose to deny the project, due to the removal <br />of the 9th unit. If the Planning Commission chooses to go down that. road, then <br />the Tentative Map would have to be revised. <br /> <br />Commissioner Claire asked if there were any serious parking Issues in the <br />neighborhood. <br /> <br />Ms. Erika Crowley, resident in the neighborhood, said it gets very crowded when <br />there are guests. <br /> <br />M/S: (Seybert/Claire) that the findings on Circle Page 10, show that the proposed <br />entitlements will result in development compatible. with the existing <br />neighborhood; Zoning regulations; and the General Plan, and that the condo <br />conversion conforms to the requirements as determined by Chapter 30 of the <br />Municipal Code. <br />Motion Passed (7-O) <br /> <br />MIS: (Radcliffe/Piulle) to approve the Planned Development Permit subject to <br />conditions of approval on Circle Pages 12 and 13. <br />Motion Passed (6-1) <br /> <br />Page 7 of 10 <br /> <br />... -.-.- .-"-'.-.'.-.--.-----'--..------'.-." <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.