My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
CC Min 2002-05-20 Spc
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2002
>
CC Min 2002-05-20 Spc
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/5/2005 2:33:25 PM
Creation date
6/13/2002 11:26:24 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Special
Agency Type
City Council
Date
5/20/2002
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
B. Housing and Traffic Demand Impacts of Non-Residential Development; <br /> (702) <br /> Recommendation: <br /> City Council to determine whether to authorize a Housing Alternatives Study as <br /> outlined in the staff report; <br /> <br /> Council Member Ruskin requested that the item be continued to the next meeting <br /> due to the fact that Kaiser had only one day to respond to their name being <br /> mentioned in the report. <br /> <br /> Community Development Director Liedstrand stated the delay would not impact <br /> any existing projects. <br /> <br />8:08 P.M. - Council Member Jordan arrived <br /> <br /> M/S Ruskin/Howard to continue this item to the meeting of June 3, 2002. The <br /> motion passed by a majority voice vote by those present, with Council Member <br /> Jordan abstaining (arrived after discussion) and Vice Mayor Ira absent. <br /> MINUTE ORDER 02-138 <br /> <br />8. MATTERS OF COUNCIL INTEREST- <br /> <br />8:15 P.M. - Vice Mayor Ira arrived <br /> <br /> B. Council Member Jordan - after receiving Mayor Claire's assessment of the oral <br /> communications and Council consensus regarding an appeal process, Council <br /> Member Jordan made her statements on the topic. She stated that it is possible <br /> the policy is not applicable in Redwood Shores because there are no planting <br /> strips in that area. She further stated that if a canopy type effect were to be <br /> achieved in Redwood Shores, it would in effect, shade the entire house. She <br /> stated that at a minimum, the policy should be reviewed and that some residents <br /> would like an appeal process. <br /> <br /> Robert Sapeka stated several concerns such as residents not being regarded and <br /> that planting would be directly in front of the house. He further questioned why <br /> Council would want to force a resident to have a tree if the resident opposes the <br /> idea and that an appeal process is a good idea. <br /> <br /> Patricia Dixon stated if a tree is to be planted, she would want a substantially <br /> sized tree. <br /> <br />SPECIAL COUNCIL MEETING MAY 20, 2002 <br />MINUTES PAGE 6 <br />MINUTES Book No, 59 <br />Page No. 165 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.