My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2005-06-06
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009 partial
>
2005
>
AgdaPkt 2005-06-06
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/16/2012 4:59:18 PM
Creation date
6/2/2005 3:59:06 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Date
6/6/2005
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
249
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
��• 3,� <br /> Many cities, such as San Francisco, Berkeley, Boston, West Hollywood, and Aspen have <br /> installed pay-by-space meters and have had success with them. Sta€f feels that they are ideal for <br /> the core area, identified in Fi�re g. In addition to the curb parking in the Downtown core, staff <br /> also recommends that all parking lots not affected by the Parking Facilities Agreement between <br /> the City and the On Broadway developer be equipped with these meters (Main Street Lot, <br /> Library Lot, City Hall Lot, City Hall Lot B, Winslow Lot, and Perry Street Lot). This equals <br /> approximately 60 meters, with a purchase and installation cost of between $150,000 and <br /> $250,000, depending on which models are used. <br /> Municipal Code Section 20.116 states "The City Manager is hereby directed to provide for the <br /> purchase, acquiring, installation, operation, maintenance, supervision, regulation, and use of the <br /> parking meters provided for in this Division and to maintain the meters in good workable <br /> condition." <br /> Recommendation #4: Create a Parking Benefit District <br /> Currently, all pazking meter and permit revenue is deposited into the Parking Fund. These <br /> monies may be used only for expenses related directly to the maintenance and operation of the <br /> Downtown parking system. Currently, the fund nearly breaks even. However, once parking <br /> charges are collected into the evenings and on the weekends and once market prices are charged, <br /> some excess revenue will be generated. <br /> The opening of the cinema and imposition of the new parking management system discussed in <br /> this paper represent a major shift in the Downtown parking paradigm. This makes it difficult to <br /> know exactly what parking revenues will be once the cinema opens up and once the new prices <br /> are implemented, it is possible to make good estimates. Assuming moderate increases in parking <br /> use and the initial price scheme laid out in Recommendation #l, anywhere from $1.4 million to <br /> $1.8 million dollars (net) should be generated. The low figure assumes that the number of cars <br /> parking in Downtown DOES NOT INCREASE with the opening of the cinema and drastic <br /> increases in expenses. This is unlikely. The high figure is based on moderate increases in parkers <br /> and operating expenses. In an attempt to be as conservative as possible, staff developed a <br /> "doomsday" scenario in which all parking was only $0.25 per hour, occupancy rates fell below <br /> current levels, and parking use was so low on evenings and Sundays that charging wasn't <br /> justified during those periods. This scenario resulted in an annual balance of $160,000 after <br /> expenses. <br /> Staff recommends that after all of the City's parking costs are paid, surplus revenue from the <br /> previous fiscal year could be used for improvements to the Downtown. Only the azea with <br /> parking meters should receive the improvements, and the use of these funds should be at the <br /> discretion of the City Council, under the advisement of a Parking Fund Advisory Committee <br /> (PFAC) made of up Downtown merchants. This committee should have five members, appointed <br /> by the City Council for two year terms. The PFAC should meet at least quarterly to make <br /> spending recommendations to the Council. The boundaries of the area to receive benefits from <br /> meters should match the boundaries of the metered area in Figure 1. <br /> pa�e 30 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.