Laserfiche WebLink
from entering the Marshall Street parking lot be removed and bicycle racks be <br />provided. <br />Hilary Paulson, Planning Commission Chair and Downtown Advisory Group member, <br />Commended staff and stated two concerns. The first concern was spill over <br />parking into the Mezes and Stambaugh - Heller. The second concern is the desire <br />to not penalize the families using the library. <br />Adrian Brandt suggested the option of a parking cash out program for employees <br />that could provide for an incentive to split the value of a permit so that the <br />employee receives a portion of the value and agrees to utilize public transit. This <br />would equate to the City buying a spot that can then be sold at market rates for <br />even more people coming into town. He encouraged the use of a grace period <br />and offered the example of Caltrain's recent method. He supported the Plan. <br />Don Wilson stated that he has tried to obtain a clear understanding of the agreement <br />with Mr. Irmer and whether parking really means free parking. He stated that the <br />parking plan is good and the concept to adopt market rate parking is good. His <br />concern is that there would be two classes served by the Plan with retail /cinema <br />patrons entitled to free parking and everyone else paying market rate. <br />Pat Taviss, a member of the Downtown Advisory Group commended staffs team <br />and commented on the library and employee parking lot stating that when the <br />restaurants went in across the street, as early as 11:00 a.m., people would pay <br />the meter and the lot and jaywalk across. With the smartcard system, she <br />expressed hope that a library card might be read and provide for validation. She <br />stated the disadvantage that the employee parking at the library is visible and the <br />parking behind City Hall is invisible and asked if the fleeted vehicles could be <br />parked elsewhere to allow for metered or validated parking for library patrons. <br />She stated that the traffic flow must be considered pointing to the intersection of <br />Jefferson and Middlefield that does not encourage people to easily maneuver <br />across the four corners. She summarized that while individual pieces of the Plan <br />are good; putting them together makes sense and provides a good plan. <br />Kim Wilkins stated that her family owns the building at 702 Marshall Street, <br />adjacent to the Marshall Street parking garage and in 1994 a settlement <br />agreement was reached with the City after eminent domain proceedings. She <br />stated that the agreement provided for parking spaces for the building and she <br />estimated that 170 spaces are needed during business hours. She further stated <br />that the building is occupied up to 90% by attorneys who often work until 7:00 <br />p.m. <br />Council comments included acknowledging staffs extensive research and <br />benchmarking. The need for more information before July 11 in order to react <br />before consideration of the ordinance was expressed; general support for the 5 <br />REGULAR MEETING MINUTES JUNE 6, 2005 <br />CITY COUNCIL PAGE 6 <br />MINUTE BOOK NO. 60 <br />Page No. 490 <br />