Laserfiche WebLink
<br />s./.E-~ <br /> <br />alternatives, if needed, will be developed in response to the findings of the <br />environmental analyses and the various technical studies and may include altemative , <br />project design to mitigate one or more of the identified significant adverse impacts of the <br />proposed project. This may include a revised site plan or other feasible development <br />scenarios for the site. The No Project alternative is required by CEQA and will evaluate <br />no new development on the project site. The advantages and disadvantages of each <br />alternative will be compared to the proposed project and reasons for rejecting or <br />recommending the alternative will be discussed in the EIR. <br />11.0 References, Persons and Agencies Contacted and EIR Preparation <br />12.0 List of Preparers/Organizations Consulted. <br /> <br />Summarized below is our approach to key environmental issues to be addressed in <br />sections 5.0 of the EIR <br /> <br />Land Use, Planning and Zoning <br />The Land Use, Planning and Zoning discussion will be the first impact topic to be <br />addressed in the EIR. This will allow the reader to be easily acquainted with the project. <br />The other analyses will follow in a logical manner from the base established in the Land <br />Use, Planning and Zoning section. <br /> <br />, <br /> <br />The land use analysis will describe existing plans and policies that affect the project <br />site. The land use section will address any proposed changes to land use designations, <br />zones, development intensity, and infrastructure. The analysis shall address <br />compatibility with adjacent land uses and intensities of development with particular <br />emphasis on the transition between the proposed land uses and adjacent existing land <br />uses, As such, the EIR will include a plan-to-plan and plan-to-ground analysis. <br /> <br />Aesthetics <br />This section of the EIR will address both existing and potential visual quality effects of <br />the project, especially as it relates to community character. In addition, the EIR will <br />address the visual impact of the proposed project from public vantage points. The <br />project site is highly visible form a variety of public view shed areas. <br /> <br />Noise <br />OEA will incorporate the results of the noise analysis prepared by Giroux and <br />Associatesto evaluate the impacts of the proposed project. This section of the EIR will <br />address the ambient noise environment of the property and assess potential impacts <br />associated with short-term construction and vehicular impacts upon surrounding uses. <br />Noise impacts will be related to the established City performance standards, and <br />appropriate mitigation measures provided if necessary. The Noise analysis prepared <br />for the project will include: <br /> <br />. Development of a baseline noise exposure profile in terms of the CNEL noise metric <br />using the FHWA Model with the latest Califomia vehicle noise curves (CALVENO). <br /> <br />. Preparation of a no-project versus with-project mobile noise impact comparison, <br />including any viable project alternative development scenarios. Identify specific <br />sensitive receiver locations where mobile source noise impacts may adversely <br />affect project vicinity residents. This would analysis would include a review of noise <br /> <br />Atty/Agr/2005,O24 <br />062105 <br /> <br />13 <br />