Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />Circulation <br />Advisory Committee <br /> <br /> <br />Conservation <br />Advisory Committee <br /> <br /> <br />Human Resources <br />Advisory Subcommittee <br /> <br />Public/Interested Committees/Organizations <br />(e.g. Redwood City 2000, Chamber of <br />Commerce, etc.) <br /> <br /> <br />Pros: Provides opportunity for public input at the various committee levels, each committee <br />will be made up of individuals who are truly interested in that particular topic who could then <br />help write portions of the General Plan. (For example, the Parks and Recreation Commission <br />has already put together such a committee to work on a strategic plan. Such a plan will be <br />incorporated as all or part of the Open Space Element.) <br /> <br />Con: Employing an advisory committee will add substantial time to the overall work program <br />as compared to a steering committee approach. Staff will have to provide orientation and <br />background information to the committees, and there will have to be major coordination by <br />staff and/or consultants of the various committees. . <br /> <br />c) Combination of Steering Committee and Advisory Committee <br />Numeroqs committees and groups may want to. participate in the General Plan update (either <br />become part of the above committees or have a separate review). A combination approach <br />of advisory committee and steering committee will maximize public input. The following is <br />such a model: ' <br /> <br /> <br />Steering Committee <br />- Council Appointments <br />- Interested Groups <br />- Public <br /> <br />General Plan Topic <br />Subcommittee <br /> <br /> <br />General Plan Topic <br />Subcommittee <br /> <br /> <br />General Plan Topic <br />Subcommittee <br /> <br /> <br /> Staff Resources~ <br /> <br />Pros: Such a model maximizes public input, actively involving the public in drafting policies <br />and writing a portion of the document. <br /> <br />.., <br />