My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2000-02-28
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009 partial
>
2000
>
AgdaPkt 2000-02-28
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/13/2011 1:31:41 PM
Creation date
6/28/2005 11:33:17 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Regular
Date
2/28/2000
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
169
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />86-') <br /> <br />that residents felt second units is a widespread problem.) <br /> <br />. Conduct a windshield survey in each of the City's neighborhoods to estimate the <br />number of second units, both detached and attached to the main residence. It is <br />important to estimate the number of second units in order to determine the magnitude <br />of the impact of a change in policy. <br /> <br />. Change the City's requirements to allow more property to qualify for a second unit; for <br />example, permit an owner to rent a parking space on another site (not on the street) <br />if that space lies within a certain radius of the subject property. Determine the number <br />of properties that qualify for a second unit if the changes are enacted. <br /> <br />. Consider reducing the parking requirement in the case of legalizing illegal units. This <br />may be a disincentive to creating legal units under the accessory dwelling unit <br />ordinance. <br /> <br />. Develop an amnesty program similar to that of Daly City. This would be a 2 to 3 year <br />program depending on the length of time set for the window of opportunity to gain <br />amnesty. <br /> <br />. Use rehabilitation funds to bring an illegal unit up to code when the resulting unit will <br />be affordable to people with low and/ or moderate incomes for the duration of the <br />loan. (This is currently the practice used in Redwood City for the first 5-years of the <br />loan when the unit can be made conforming to zoning). <br /> <br />It should be noted that none of these options are currently budgeted and in some cases <br />require significant time and resources over a number of years which will compete with <br />your recently established priorities. <br /> <br />Staff recommends a systematic approach of documenting these units. It would be <br />appropriate to consider methods to accomplish this in the context of the Consolidated <br />Plan and Housing Element update. <br /> <br />2. Garage Conversions <br />a. Definition. Garage conversions involve the creation of living space either for increasing <br />the square footage for the primary residents of the house, or for creating an accessory <br />dwelling. Garage conversions may be permitted with appropriate building permits, if the <br />displaced covered parking can be recreated on-site. Conversion of a garage to an <br />accessory dwelling unit also requires a building permit for an accessory dwelling unit. <br />It has been estimated that there are at least 1,500 to 2,000 garage conversions and/or <br />unapproved additional living units within Redwood City. Garage conversions are an <br />economical way to increase the living area of a home. Not only is the exterior shell and <br />roof in place, but often garages contain washer/dryer hookups and forced air heating <br />systems resulting in a space which is already partially plumbed and 'heating and <br />electrical supply readily available. <br /> <br />How manv conversions are there? Relying only on memory of current cases, code <br />enforcement staff compiled a list of properties known to have either a garage <br />conversion or additional living unit that was not approved or legal. Staff then set out to <br />photograph and document the subject properties to aid the Council in its discussion of <br />the topic. One significant finding reflected in the survey is that over one-half of the <br />properties came to be known to code enforcement through neighbor concems. With the <br />exception of ten properties that staff discovered while conducting the survey, the vast <br />majority of properties with these violations were reported by neighbors. More than 90% <br />-5- <br /> <br />b. <br /> <br />.. ..~--. .- '1!rU. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.