Laserfiche WebLink
9:30 p.m. — Closed the Public Hearing <br /> Consensus to come back to Council in a reasonably short period time, staff to bring text that <br /> � limits the meaning af the conditional use pernut �to see an option toward a� discretionary permit <br /> that includes the notification of neighbors, but not have the legal impact of a use permit. City <br /> Attorney to come back with an analysis of the legal impact of such a conditional use permit. <br /> The pazking in tandem continue to be a part of the report coming back. Staff come back with an <br /> option to not include the 15-ft. setback. Staff analysis of how to contain the potential ripple <br /> affect. Options about the size of the second unit (possibly up to 750 sq. ft:) and the option of a <br /> percentage and its effects on very lazge lots. Look at what other cities do to monitor impact in <br /> particulaz azeas. Staff consider what real limits exist regarding tandem parking. Evaluate six <br /> month report feasibi�rty aa� v�hether realirsticatty�stafF ecr�cnc�: <br /> 10:17-10:30 p.m - Recess <br /> B. Illegal Second Units, and Illegal Gazage Conversions, Code Enforcement Approach and <br /> Administrative Citations (No Legal Advertisement Required for this item, but incorporated <br /> as a part of the Changes to Accessory Dwelling Unit report); <br /> Terry Stewart stated his issue was initially the carports he stated he would like to see stronger <br /> amendments pertaining to conversions regazding the fire safety and ripple effect. <br /> Bob Diaz spoke of the pazking issues and stated code enforcement needs the tools to address the <br /> existing situations. <br /> Pete Hughes stated: it is an uttportant subject and should be dis�cussed in greater detail at a later <br /> . meeting. He suggested utiIizing either the San Carlos or Daly City customer friendly model. <br /> Jim Bigelow stated that in appraisals for lending purposes, illegal accessory dwelling units are not <br /> considered. <br /> Council discussion included consideration of an inventory being needed in order for a law to be <br /> applied fairly. Health and safety issue should be considered. Establishment of a base with an <br /> amnesty program and pursue code enforcement more aggresively thereafter. Questioned Code <br /> Enforcement approach for prioritizing or a proposed process. <br /> M/S Claire/Hartnett to extend the meeting to 11:30 p.m. The motion passed by a unanimous voice <br /> . vote. <br /> Council consensus on possibility of inver�tory with staff showing impact on staff, look more closely <br /> at amnesty with more detailed explanation of other cities' programs to analyze real problems results, <br /> advantages and could we feasibly apply here. During interim, staff to continue ahead regazding <br /> health and safety issues. Look at options for carports and continue. with enforcement, .while looking , <br /> at impacts on staff. � . - • <br /> REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING ' April 10, 2000 <br /> • MINUT'ES PAGE 6 <br />