My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2000-05-22
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009 partial
>
2000
>
AgdaPkt 2000-05-22
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/24/2021 9:45:53 AM
Creation date
6/28/2005 2:54:05 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Date
5/22/2000
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
352
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />\01-\-1 <br /> <br />Amortization Requirements <br /> <br />Type of Nonconformina Siqn <br /> <br />Date for Compliance <br /> <br />Temporary signs, real estate signs, portable <br />signs, painted signs and window signs <br /> <br />Ninety (90) Days <br /> <br />Architectural banners, awning/canopy signs, <br />under canopy signs, advertising artwork and <br />blade signs <br /> <br />Two (2) years <br /> <br />Other building signs (for reasons other than <br />non-conforming sign area)* <br /> <br />Four years** <br /> <br />Freestanding signs and all other signs <br /> <br />Seven (7) years <br /> <br />* A building façade where the combined area of signs exceeds the limitation set <br />forth in Section 3.78a ("Sign Area") of this article. <br /> <br />** The sign area in excess of the limitation set forth in Section 3.78 (Sign Area) of <br />the article shall be reduced by 25% per year. <br /> <br />Fiscal impact <br />Enforcement of signs require constant, systematic and consistent enforcement actions. <br />One enforcement action usually triggers enforcement of numerous other sites (typically <br />pointed out by the original violator). The sign inventory will also need to be updated on a <br />regular basis. Enforcement efforts of signs generally involve two hours of staff time of <br />initial work followed by several hours of follow-up over the enforcement period (which can <br />take an estimated minimum of several weeks, assuming no formal legal action is <br />required). Considering the number of businesses, the proportion of violations and the <br />amount of signs in the City; it is estimated that two full-time staff positions assigned to <br />such duties could effectively cover the enforcement process. A strategy to achieve <br />Citywide and comprehensive sign enforcement could involve a "blitz" by temporary <br />E3nfQJç~m~mt §taff hir~d fox ttla1 speciftc pUIp_ose. This .eQuld occur white the inventory. is <br />"fresh." The effort would be expected to occur over a period of six months and regular <br />code enforcement staff would then be expected to follow-up this enforcement action. <br /> <br />A) Citywide Physical Improvements <br />If and when the City chooses to proceed with the Citywide enforcement process, <br />the subsequent impact to the physical appearance of businesses should result <br />in a visible improvement to the commercial portion of the City. Façades are <br />expected to look more attractive and appear "cleaned up". Such enforcement <br />should also to bring higher quality and more permanent sign applications, <br />versus cheaper temporary signage and cluttered façade treatment. <br /> <br />As an option, the City could decide to enforce the most visible urban areas i.e., <br />EI Camino Real and/or Woodside Road only. This district by district approach <br />would therefore not affect all businesses in the City (387 out of a total of 1316 <br />businesses in this scenario) and thus, require less staff time to enforce. <br /> <br />_.. """"r'' - <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.