Laserfiche WebLink
<br />'7~4 <br />and not an eyesore of cars and garages immediately along the street. However, staff does <br />recognize that many of the garages are actually converted to storage areas, with cars <br />usually parked in the driveway. This condition is not illegal and we do not force people to <br />park in their garages. <br /> <br />The City currently does not accept any 'tandem' parking spaces (spaces right behind each <br />other) in the driveway as fulfilling the required parking even if they are outside the required <br />front yard setback of 20 ft. The reason for this is that the Zoning Ordinance seeks to <br />ensure full-time access to a garage, and tandem parking may prevent this. <br /> <br />Of all the requirements of the Accessory Dwelling Unit Ordinance, the parking requirement <br />is one of the most limiting factors in achieving more legally built units. Should the City <br />Council chose any of the options described below, existing illegal units could be legalized. <br />In other words, easing the parking requirement would be the basis of an amnesty program. <br />Usually a City's first and major effort in proposing an amnesty program for illegal second <br />units is to relax its parking requirement. <br /> <br />Daly City is an example of one City's successful amnesty program that did relax parking <br />requirements. It created a 2-year window of opportunity during which most illegal second <br />units could be legalized providing there was only one dwelling unit on the property. In <br />summary, Daly City reduced its parking standards for second units during the amnesty <br />program in 2 ways. First, they reduced the number of required parking spaces (four <br />parking spaces) based on the following criteria: for houses built before 1949 (which were <br />smaller), a total of 2 off-street parking spaces were required. These spaces could be <br />covered or uncovered; for houses built after 1949 (which were usually larger), a total 3 off- <br />street parking spaces were required to be provided, either covered or uncovered. <br /> <br />Second, Daly City allowed parking in the required setback area other than the driveway. <br />A paving ordinance was adopted that allowed a concrete slab to be poured in the front yard <br />areas within the set-back, to provide additional parking spaces so the off-street parking <br />requirements could be satisfied for the amnesty applicant. It should be noted that this was <br />done in concert with the Project Homesafe Amnesty Program only. At the completion of <br />the amnesty program, the paving ordinance was eliminated. <br /> <br />During that time, Daly City also lowered its inspection fees and waived any penalties. <br /> <br />Currently, Daly City does not allow the setback area to be used to satisfy parking <br />requirements. They do allow tandem parking for existing second unit properties, but not for <br />new second unit construction. Additionally, all of the four required parking spaces for new <br />two unit properties have to be non-tandem covered spaces. Existing properties, when <br />applying for second unit approvals, are required to provide a minimum of two covered <br />spaces and two uncovered. These can be tandem, up to two cars. In other words, the <br />applicant would need to provide a two-car garage and a driveway with the two additional <br />parking spaces, to satisfy the parking requirements. <br /> <br />Landowners with illegal units, who did not seek to legalize their units during the amnesty <br />period, if caught later, are required to comply with the current standards (2 parking spaces <br />for the main house and 2 for the second units) or remove the illegal units, and pay a <br />$1,000 fine in either event. Thus Daly City temporarily relaxed parking standards for <br />existing properties with illegal units; but, they did not permanently change their standards. <br /> <br />3 <br />