My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2000-08-14
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009 partial
>
2000
>
AgdaPkt 2000-08-14
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/24/2021 8:42:53 AM
Creation date
6/28/2005 4:29:32 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Date
8/14/2000
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
480
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
�oc•s � <br /> CITY COUNCIL UTILITIES COMMITTEE <br /> GUIDING PRINCIPLES <br /> WATER ENTERPRISE FUND <br /> June1998 <br /> Compliance with City Cou�cil Policy: <br /> Choices and decisions by the Committee and ultimately the Council should be guided by <br /> the seven Guidina PrinciDi@g for the Water Enterprise Fund, approved and adopted in <br /> 1993 by the City Council at the recommendation of the Water & Sewer Policy Committee: <br /> I. REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES IN BALANCE <br /> Philosophy: The Water Fund is an enterprise fund which should be self-sustaining and pay for <br /> all on-going operations and maintenance costs. Prudent management practices indicate that <br /> revenues and expenditures should be in balance each fiscal year, with an ending fund balance <br /> of zero. <br /> II. BASIC SERVICE CHARGE EQUAL TO FIXED COSTS <br /> Philosophy: This foced portion of a customer's water bill covers the total fixed costs of operating <br /> and maintaining the Redwood City water system IE; salaries, benefits, equipment, supplies and <br /> services, which are within the direct control of the City Council. <br /> 111. EQUITABLE DlSTRIBUTION OF COSTS ACROSS ENTIRE WATER SYSTEM <br /> Philosophy.� The 1993 Joint Recommendation from the Water 8 Sewer Policy Committee and <br /> staff to the City Council focused on resolving equity issues in both how the City had been charging <br /> for water services and in ensuring that no one customer group was subsidizing another by virtue <br /> of rate differentials. <br /> IV. WATER CONSERVATION RATE STRUCTURE <br /> Philosophy.• The City's Urban Water Management Plan (UWMP), adopted by the City Council in <br /> 1992 and the basis for the City's being a party to the State Memorandum Of Understanding for <br /> water conservation (AB 325) mandates the City to use water conservation rates as a means to <br /> promote and achieve water conservation goals. Under a water consenration rate structure, rates <br /> increase as a water customer's use increases (the more water that is used, the more per unit the <br /> user pays). Water conservation rates provide a strong incentive to save water, since each <br /> additional increment of water used becomes more expensive. Furthermore, � the water used <br /> above the lifeline allotrnent is charged at the rate for the highest amount used during each billing <br /> period. <br /> V. ON-GOING CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM <br /> Philosophy: A prudent Capital Improvement Program (CIP) provides for. <br /> 1) The systematic replacement of the distribution system (pipes, pumps and reservoi�s) and <br /> support facilities within an acceptable life cycle and before normal wear and tear renders <br /> system components inoperable. <br /> 2) A long-range strategic plan to ensure that all health and safety standards and regulatory <br /> requirements are met on a continuous basis. <br /> 3) A degree of financial flexibility, to respond to federal, state and regional regulations which <br /> Page 1 of 2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.