My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2000-10-23
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009 partial
>
2000
>
AgdaPkt 2000-10-23
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/16/2012 3:17:14 PM
Creation date
7/6/2005 9:09:40 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Date
10/23/2000
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
252
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
_ .� ; � <br /> .� . <br /> To n�E r�o�ow►e� <br /> �u►�roR �wo cmr �couNCK _ <br /> September 1, 1988 wtoN► TME nT�r MI►r'WOl�t <br /> INFORMATION ONLY <br /> EXTENSION OF DEVELOPMENT ON LAUREL WAY . j <br /> � <br /> This is an information report to recap the history of Lhis subject, inform the <br /> Council about recent applications for building permits and staff's intended <br /> actions. <br /> Background and Discussion: <br /> In 1970 the City unsuccessfully attempted to have public improvements in <br /> Laurel Way installed under an assessment district. (The chronology of the <br /> district is in Appendix "A"). Plans and specifications were prepared and a <br /> soil and geologic investigation undertaken. They are a�ailable as input to an <br /> environmental impact report considered necessary by the staff, subject to <br /> revisions af the construction documents to current materials and•construction <br /> standards. The soil and geologic investigation must be updated to provide <br /> design and quality control for future development. Staff continuPS to have <br /> major concerns about gealogic conditions in this area which may expose people <br /> or s ruc ures to geologic hazards. <br /> In addition, the plans and specifications prepared in 2970 do not conform to <br /> current ordinances, specifically the street width. This leaves two options: <br /> Option 1: Amend the pertinent Ordinance to permit the non-conforming <br /> street width. In such case, the Laurel Way right-of-way which <br /> was offered for dedication and not accepted on the Subdivision <br /> Map, could be accepted by the City, or <br /> Option 2: C�ndition any further development subject to a owners <br /> adjacent to the extsting unimproved private streef �o enter <br /> into an agreement to maintain the street. <br /> It should be understood that a decision ta allow development to proceed on <br /> Laurel Miay will almost certainly require that variances be given for the <br /> construction of each dwelling. The lots are so steep that we can expect that <br /> there will be substandard setbacks from the street and building heights <br /> exceeding the 30-foot height limit. In addition, there may be a substantial <br /> loss of mature trees and a significant amount of grading. <br /> A prior staff report explaining the development problems is in Appendix "6". <br /> Since that report, the Hatfields have built a house, and provided water and ; <br /> sewer line extensions under a special improvement agreement with the City. ; <br /> This Agreement also required construction of road improvements for one-half of <br /> the street width, and specified that the streets shall remain private unless <br /> later improved to its full width under assessment or o±her proceedings. The <br /> Cc�.t►�•ct� \�ll ..� �i i2 5E <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.