AgdaPkt 2000-11-13 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

would not impede the department's ability to respond to emergency calls. ~/') Conclusion The FEIR has adequately addressed the three issues raised in the appeal: 1) The EIR analyzes a potential mixed-use project with a housing component in Alternative 2. 2) The EIR analyzes the parking needs generated by the project using a professionally accepted model of Shared Parking; and 3) the EIR analyzes cumulative traffic impacts (to 2020) using a methodology that incorporates, not only local, but regional volumes as well. As noted in the previous discussion regarding the assertion that the Interim Urgency Ordinance was not discussed in the EIR, the proposed project, located in the CBR zoning district downtown, would be exempt from the ordinance because a Development' Agreement (DA) and Disposition and Development Agreement (DDA) would be required as part of the project approval process. Therefore, no discussion is required. Alternative Actions Under the City's CEQA Procedures (Resolution No. 6886 as amended by Resolution No. 7805), the following alternative actions may be taken by the Council on the appeal: 1. Affirm the certification of the FEIR by the Planning Commission (i.e. deny the appeal); 2. Reverse the decision of the Planning Commission to certify the FEIR (i.e. grant the appeal); 3. Modify the decision of the Planning Commission by certifying the FEIR with revisions to the text and/or comments as appropriate; or 4. Pending final determination on the appeal, refer the matter to the Planning Commission for recommenda!i.,". . œ:LJf- p, .. ~ b ;=;. ~ . ~(L.) ILu~ i'~~ " Patricia J. Web' Michael Church Ed Everett Economic Development Planning and Redevelopment City Manager Coordinator . Manager . Attachment Letter of appeal from Mr. Ted Hannig 6 -""""""¡--'--T'