Agmt17 Scott Galet - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

7. On June 12, 2017, the San Mateo County Superior Court appointed CONSERVATOR as temporary conservator of the person and estate of OWNER, who could not manage his health or finances. Following his appointment, CONSERVATOR began working with CITY to develop a plan to abate the public nuisance conditions at the PROPERTY and to cancel the VOID DEED to clear title to the PROPERTY. 8. On July 12, 2017, CONSERVATOR obtained a court order cancelling the VOID DEED which CONSERVATOR recorded in the Official Records of San Mateo County on July 13, 2017. The recordation of the VOID DEED quieted title to the PROPERTY in OWNER'S name. 9. On July 18, 2017 the San Mateo County Superior Court appointed CONSERVATOR as conservator of the person and estate of OWNER finding that OWNER was unable to provide for his personal needs for physical health, food, clothing, or shelter, and was substantially unable to manage his financial resources or to resist fraud or undue influence. CONSERVATOR Letters of Conservatorship were recorded in the Official Records of San Mateo County thereafter. Since his appointment, CONSERVATOR has been working with CITY to implement a plan to abate the nuisance conditions at the PROPERTY. 10. Based on the adoption of Resolution 15574, the CITY is authorized to demolish all of the buildings on the PROPERTY at any time in order to abate the public nuisance. CONSERVATOR wishes to defer the CITY's demolition of the buildings on the PROPERTY to provide him an opportunity to abate the public nuisance voluntarily. Specifically, CONSERVATOR wishes the opportunity to properly reconstruct or repair the buildings on the PROPERTY as outlined in the recommended remedies noted in Exhibit D to the Resolution rather than demolish the buildings on the PROPERTY. The CITY requires abatement of the public nuisance to take place in a timely manner. 11. On August 16, 2017, the San Mateo County Superior Court entered its order authorizing CONSERVATOR to implement his plan to reconstruct or repair the buildings on the PROPERTY to abate the public nuisance. 12. Because CITY requires the public nuisance be abated in a timely manner, and because CONSERVATOR wishes to have an opportunity to abate the public nuisance voluntarily by properly reconstructing or repairing the buildings on the PROPERTY, the PARTIES wish to provide a reasonable, but limited, timeline for CONSERVATOR to abate the nuisance. AGREEMENT Now, therefore, in consideration of the recitals and mutual promises contained herein, PARTIES mutually agree as follows: ATTY/AGR/2017.233/COMPLIANCE AGREEMENT —112-120 VERA AVENUE REV: 10-12-17 RL Page 2 of 7