Laserfiche WebLink
of the Project would <br />pollutant emissions. <br />Moreover, areas surrounding the <br />Project site include existing emissions <br />generating uses, including heavy <br />industrial uses, nearby highways and <br />active railroad tracks. <br />The Project is not considered to <br />inciude sensitive receptors (e.g., <br />residences, schools, medical <br />facilities), nor are sensitive receptors <br />existing or proposed in proximity to the <br />Project site. <br />4.3 Biological Resources <br />Context: <br />Development of the Project is not <br />expected to involve direct impacts to <br />wetlands, waters, special aquatic <br />sites, as none exist on or adjacent to <br />the project site. It may, however, affect <br />trees or other avian use areas <br />Construction <br />• For construction health risk, Consultant will qualitatively discuss <br />the potential for concentrations of diesel particulate matter <br />(DPM) and fine particulates (PM2.5) for construction to pose <br />lifetime cancer risk to the nearest sensitive receptors. <br />Consultant anticipates that the risk from construction TACs <br />would be screened out from the EIR due to the distance of the <br />project site from the nearest potential receptors. The <br />assessment will present the necessary information to <br />demonstrate the potential for adverse risk during construction. <br />Operations <br />• The analyysis will present the dally operational emissions of <br />ROG, NR PMro and PM2.5for the Project and current <br />significance thresholds for each. The analysis will input the <br />Project vehicle trip generation rates (provided in the Traffic <br />Study) into CaIEEMod (Version 2013.2.2), accounting for any <br />modal split adjustment factors. <br />• Conduct an assessment of potential cumulative exposure to <br />localized excess cancer risks from existing sources of diesel <br />particulate matter (DPM) as well as increases in fine particulate <br />matter (PM2.5) concentrations at proposed sensitive receptors. <br />Consultant does not propose to conduct a model run for TAC <br />assessment; it wilt apply the BAAQMD methodology of <br />assessing TAC impacts based on the cumulative contribution of <br />data provided by BAAQMD. <br />• Consultant will apply the CaIEEMod defaults for all other inputs <br />except that any fireplaces will be assumed to be natural gas - <br />d only). Consultant will also modify default inputs for any <br />project -specific inputs that the project sponsor may provide. <br />• Identify any sources of TACs associated with the Project itself, <br />however, because the Project does not include sensitive <br />receptors,Consultant will not conduct a model run or BAAQMD <br />methodology to assess TAC impacts to proposed on-site <br />receptors. <br />Consultant will: <br />• Reconfirm identification and characterization of any special <br />status species habitats on site. <br />• Reconfirm onsite non-native species onsite that may be <br />invasive orconsidered a threat to special status is cies. Also <br />describe aspects of the Project that may improve habitat <br />conditions or create additional special status species habitat. <br />• Identify the potential Project -level efforts of the on special. <br />status plants, communities, or wildlife or wildlife migratory use <br />areas. <br />Air quality and health risk <br />effects from TACs will be <br />based on current adopted <br />BAAQMD thresholds and <br />CEQA Guidelines. <br />• The Project would be <br />developed atone time, <br />fully completed and <br />operational by 2040. <br />• No odor -producing uses <br />are proposed. <br />• The IHSP could result in <br />outdoor recreation uses, <br />but would not be <br />considered sensitive <br />useslreceptors for CEQA <br />purposes. <br />Data Needs: <br />None required. <br />Assumptions: <br />• Minimal change is <br />anticipated to the Setting <br />from the 2015 Draft EIR. <br />• No protocol -level surveys <br />for state or federally listed <br />wildlife will be required. <br />• Update text and graphics from the 2015 Draft EIR that No formal wetland <br />delineation will be <br />summarize federal, state, and local policies and regulations, <br />such as the State and federal Endangered Sppeecies Acts, required. <br />MacAteer-Pettis Act, Section 404 and 401 ofthe Clean Water <br />Act, Rivers and Harbors Act, Migratory Bird Treaty Act among <br />others. <br />• Based on existing documentation and the reconnaissance <br />Page 15 of 26 <br />REV: 11-0E-17 PR <br />ATTY/AGR.2017.262/ESA / Harbor View Project <br />