My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
Agmt17 Environmental Science Associates (ESA)
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agreements
>
2010-2019
>
2017
>
Agmt17 Environmental Science Associates (ESA)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/11/2022 4:43:55 PM
Creation date
11/21/2017 9:08:42 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Agreement
Contractor Name
Environmental Science Associates (ESA)
PROJECT NAME
Harbor View Project
RMP File Number
304
Date
11/17/2017
MO Ref
17-205, 18-149, 19-167, 20-139
Amendment
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
59
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
• Discuss the Project relative to geological or seismic goals and <br />policies identified in the IHSP <br />As appropriate, identify project -level mitigation measures to <br />address geological and seismic conditions, specifically from <br />project and site-specific requirements or recommendations for <br />geotechnical preparations and foundation systems identified in the <br />Project -specific geotechnical /soils report prepared by a qualified <br />consultant of the project sponsor. <br />4.6 Greenhouse Gas Emissions <br />Context: <br />Consultant will: <br />Data Needs: <br />Construction and operation of the <br />Project would generate greenhouse <br />,Use EMFAC2011 emission tactors, the latest version of the <br />• Estimated buildout <br />schedule for the Project. <br />gas (GHG) emissions. These <br />CalEEMod air quality model to develop an emissions inventory <br />remediation actions <br />emissions could be partially offset by <br />of the Project's net contribution to GHG emissions resulting <br />• Construction Phasing and <br />removal of the existing uses on the <br />from the oject's increases in nrobile source emissions (i.e., <br />Equipment Data <br />Project site that may be less energy <br />motor vehicle traffic and VMT) and stationary area source <br />a <br />Sustainability measures <br />efficient. <br />emissions (i.e., natural gas combustion, electricity demand, <br />beyond CalGree <br />water and wastewater treatment and conveyance and solid <br />land uses. <br />waste generation) and of carbon dioxide equivalents (CO2e) <br />• Energy Use: Estimates of <br />under the proposed Project. <br />projected annual energy <br />usage at full build out. <br />• Estimate the offset GHG emissions frau existing uses that may <br />be removed with implementation of the Project. <br />• Construction Phasing and <br />Equipment Data <br />• As feasible, post -processing adjustments be made the <br />al a <br />inventory to reflect PG&E -specific electrical emission factors for <br />c <br />, Proposed TDM Program <br />oP o9 <br />the relevant future year and to account for any identified. <br />Operational vehicle trip <br />sustainable building recommendations under the existing Green <br />Building Ordinance. Factor quantifiable Project -specific <br />generation data (from the <br />Traffic Study, Task 4.14). <br />sustainability features into the Project characteristics. <br />• Assess the quantified GHG emissions that would result from the <br />Assumption: <br />Project. This determination will be made relative to BAAQMD's <br />Minimal change is <br />project -level threshold, 4.6 metric tons of CO2e per service <br />anticipated to the Setting <br />population to determine if GHG emissions are cumulatively <br />from the 2015 Draft EIR. <br />considerable. <br />• Discuss the Projects sustainable features and GHG emissions <br />The an <br />The analysis will be <br />be <br />with respect to the goals and recommended actions of the <br />state's Climate Change Scoping Plan and the Citys guidance <br />ly pursuant to <br />conBAAQMD <br />and IHSP policies. <br />apuirsu <br />ent <br />thresholds and CEQA <br />Guidelines. <br />4.7 Hazards and Hazardous Materials <br />Context: <br />Consultant will: <br />Data Need: <br />Development of the Project could <br />• Reconfirmation of specific <br />involve earthwork activities that would <br />Reconfirm from the 2015 Draft EIR: <br />remediation actions <br />encounter underlying materials, <br />including dredged fills. <br />The earthwork activities that would encounter underlying(recommended <br />by TRA <br />Er vironmental Sciences) <br />materials on the Project site, use of hazardous materials <br />during construction, and potential accidental release <br />required to achieve clean - <br />conditions during Project operations. <br />up levels of soil and <br />groundwater for proposed <br />• Any specific dean -up activities required for the Project site. <br />land uses. <br />• The evaluation of hazards and hazardous materials effects <br />Earth Calculations/Grading <br />related to construction and operation of the Project <br />Plan. <br />Page 17 of 26 <br />REV: 11-08-17 PR <br />ATTY/AGR.2017.262/ESA / Harbor View Project <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.