Laserfiche WebLink
4.8 Hydrology and Water Quality <br />Context: <br />The Project could would after existing <br />drainage patterns andpotentially <br />increase the amount of impervious <br />surfaces in the plan area. Thus it could <br />potentially increase stone water runoff <br />volumes and affect surface water <br />quality without appropriate mitigation. <br />Storm water pollution from surfaice- <br />bome contaminants such as oils, fuels, <br />dust, can degrade water quality m the <br />San Francisco Bay. Also, temporary <br />water quality degradation could be an <br />issue during construction of the project. <br />Given the low elevation and relief of the <br />plan area, there is a possibility of <br />flooding during 100 -and 5X0 -year <br />stone events. <br />4.9 Land Use and Planning <br />Context: <br />The Project will introduce new and <br />different land uses to the plan area. <br />4.10 Noise <br />Context: <br />Construction and operation of the <br />Project would temporarily affect short- <br />term ambient noise levels in the <br />Vicinity of construction sites, as well as <br />long-term noise levels. <br />The Project area includes existing <br />noise generating uses, including <br />nearby highways, active railroad <br />tracks, and the San Carlos Airport. <br />• 11111 prulecr-revei mmgauun measures to aauress nazares ane <br />hazardous materials, specifically from project and site-specific <br />Assumption: <br />requirements or recommendations in a Protect -specific Phase <br />Minimal change is <br />1 report prepared by a qualified consultant of the project <br />anticipated to the Setting <br />sponsor. <br />Fran re 2015 Draft EIR <br />• The adequacy of specific Pro'ect-level measures proposed to <br />handle contaminated soil an� groundwater, if present, and <br />corrective measures. <br />describe measures to reduce the risk of exposure to workers <br />onsite as well as potential vapor intrusion into Project. <br />Assumption: <br />Consultant will: <br />Data Needs: <br />Reconfirm from the 2015 Draft EIR: <br />• Reconfirmation of <br />• Surface hydrology of the project site, identifying significant <br />storrnwater conditions, <br />drainage features and facilities, 100 -year flood zone areas, local <br />deficiencies, and <br />stone water collection infrastructure serving the area. <br />corrective measures. <br />• Areas of existing groundwater contamination relative to the <br />project site. <br />Assumption: <br />• Storm water runoff potential, including impervious surface <br />Minimal charge is <br />calculations, natural treatment approaches, and mitigation best <br />anticipated to the Setting <br />management practices. <br />from the 2015 Draft EIR. <br />• Summarized sea level rise baseline information and, as <br />applicable from the IHSP or Project plans, potential adaptation <br />measures relative to the protect site. <br />• Discuss the Project relative to restoration goals and policies <br />identified in the General Plan. <br />• As appropriate, identify Project -level mitigation measures to <br />address hydrology and water quality effects, based on any <br />program -level mitigation measures identified in IHSP EIR <br />Consultant will: Data Need: <br />Reconfirm from the 2015 Draft EIR: • Project Description. <br />• Discuss the proposed land use change that would occur with <br />Assumption: <br />the Project and relation to existing adjacent land uses and the <br />General Plan. <br />• Minimal change is <br />• Reconfirm tabular assessment of the Project's consistency w@h <br />anticipated to the Setting <br />from the 2015 Draft EIR. <br />specific General Plan policies relevant to environmental effects. <br />Consultant will: <br />Reconfirm from the 2015 Draft EIR: <br />• Existing noise environment at the Project site. <br />• Noise levels likely to be generated by the construction <br />equipment used to develop the Project. <br />• Describe potential noise that may result from potential changes <br />in the use and intensity of land use with the Project. <br />• Calculate the change in noise levels due to baseline plus <br />Project and cumulative traffic along key regional and arterial <br />roadway segments most affected by traffic around the project <br />site. Use the noise prediction model of the Federal Highway <br />Page 18 of 26 <br />REV: 11-08-17 PR <br />ATTY/AGR.2017.262/ESA / Harbor View Project <br />Data Needs: <br />• Estimated buildout <br />schedule for the Project. <br />• Operational vehicle trip <br />generafion from Traffic <br />Study (Task 4.14). <br />Assumption: <br />• No new long-term or short- <br />term noise measurements <br />will be taken. <br />• Minimal charge is <br />