AgdaPkt 2017-12-04 Joint SA PFA - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

. . � a. Executive Summary — this provided key findings and policy considerations from the existing conditions report, listed below. b. Land Use, Streetscape, and Public Realm — this described the existing developments, parcel analysis, park and public facilities, streetscape conditions, land use, and zoning. Each section concluded with opportunities and challenges. c. Real Estate Market — this provided market assessments and key challenges for retail and lodging, office, and residential uses along the corridor. d. Transportation — this analyzed existing pedestrian, bicycle, transit, and vehicular facilities, including gaps in connectivity, safety and collision data, on -street parking supply and use, and traffic congestion (queuing). 2. Concepts and Options — this framed the discussion of concepts and more importantly, tradeoffs, for bicycling, pedestrian safety and comfort, parking, land use and activity nodes, transit, economic development and small business support, and community benefits. 3. Traffic & Bikeways Analvsis — this provided an analysis of how the removal of right turn lanes for protected bike lanes may impact traffic flow and travel time. 4. Traffic & Circulation Analysis — this explored opportunities to improve mobility for all users with specific attention on traffic flow, circulation, and interaction between users. 5. Mixed Use Live/Work Analysis — this discussed feasibility challenges associated with the mixed-use live/work zoning designation as compared to the district's purpose, examples from other jurisdictions, and policy implications. Citizens Advisory Group The City Council appointed a 10 -member Citizen's Advisory Group (CAG) of local residents, including representatives from the Planning Commission, Complete Streets Advisory Committee, and Housing and Human Concerns Committee. The Council established the CAG to act as the working body of the public and to help disseminate information. The group provided a diverse range of interests, expertise, ages, length of residency, and neighborhood representation. The City held six CAG public meetings to review and provide feedback on data analysis, street design options, corridor plan components, and the draft Plan. On October 4, 2017, the CAG held its final meeting to review and provide comment on the CAG Draft Corridor Plan. The group was supportive of the Plan, suggesting that it captured the direction received to date and provided additional feedback on how to underscore the importance of mobility to the Plan, promote testing programs for