Laserfiche WebLink
2. The site is not physically suited for the proposed type or density of <br />development. <br />The project site is physically suited for the type and density of the proposed <br />development. The site is located within the Downtown Precise Plan <br />boundaries and in an urbanized location. The site is generally flat and has <br />frontages on Bradford Street and Redwood Creek. <br />The design or proposed improvements are likely to cause substantial <br />environmental damage, or substantially and avoidably injure fish, wildlife or <br />their habitat, or cause serious public health problems. <br />The proposed lot merger and associated improvements would not pose <br />substantial environmental damage based on the CEQA determination <br />prepared for this project (see Attachment). The site is located within an <br />urbanized downtown setting and is currently fenced off and used as a parking <br />lot, which would be replaced with the proposed residential development and <br />creek side public trail. Proposed native plantings near the creek would <br />complement the existing riparian habitat. <br />4. The design or improvements of the proposed subdivision will conflict with <br />essential public easements for access through, or use of, property within the <br />proposed subdivision, unless acceptable alternate public easements will be <br />provided. <br />The proposed lot merger and associated improvements will not conflict with <br />essential public easements for access through, or use of, property within the <br />proposed subdivision. Moreover, through improvements and dedications, <br />wider sidewalks and a new public creek side trail would be constructed, which <br />enhances the pedestrian experience and promotes pedestrian access. <br />5. The reasons submitted for the granting of any exceptions applied for do not <br />comply with requirements for findings described in Section 30.69, and the <br />tentative map is deemed not workable without the granting of such <br />exceptions. <br />No exceptions to the Subdivision Ordinance are requested. <br />6. Such other findings of conflict with written public policy or with the public <br />interest as the Planning Commission may determine. <br />The proposed project does not conflict with any written public policy or with <br />the public interest. <br />Section 4. Vesting Tentative Parcel Map TM2017-03: The Planning <br />ATN/RESO.0107/PC RESO APPROVING DOWNTOWN PLAN COMMUNITY PERMIT -707 BRADFORD <br />REV: 12-01-17 PR <br />Page 4 of 23 <br />