Laserfiche WebLink
4 <br />Docktown community to try to revise the City’s granting statute in order to provide <br />existing members of the Docktown community an extended period of time (15 years) to <br />move from Docktown. <br />The proposed legislation would have allowed the Docktown residential community to <br />remain for up to 15 years, with conditions to ensure that private residential use at <br />Docktown would be limited to those individuals currently living there. This timeframe <br />would have provided time for relocation, or permitting of a new marina in another location <br />in Redwood City. However, to succeed, the proposal would have had to pass the State <br />Legislature, and that would only have been possible with the support of the State Lands <br />Commission and Attorney General’s Office. Because the Commission directed its staff to <br />work with the City on this legislative proposal, local legislators were willing to work with <br />the City, the Commission and Docktown residents to carry it forward. <br />The legislation was drafted to include restrictions on subleasing and restrictions on <br />transfer of vessels to new owners who would remain at Docktown. Because the draft <br />legislation did not have full support from members of the Docktown community and <br />members of the Redwood City community, legislators decided not to pursue the proposal. <br />Some Docktown tenants have requested renewed legislative efforts to allow residential <br />use of the Marina for an extended period of time. This is discussed below, along with <br />other comments made on the draft Docktown Plan. <br />Additionally, in November 2016, the plaintiff in the lawsuit which led to the Settlement <br />Agreement submitted a motion seeking a court-appointed official to oversee the <br />Docktown Marina closure process, arguing that the City had not upheld all terms of the <br />Settlement Agreement such as providing progress reports on preparation of the <br />Docktown Plan and by supporting legislation that, if passed, would have allowed <br />Docktown tenants to remain at Docktown Marina for 15 years under certain conditions. <br />On November 21, 2016, the San Mateo County Superior Court denied the motion and <br />determined that the parties did not contractually agree to submit disputes related to the <br />settlement agreement to a court official. The court did not rule on whether the City's <br />pursuit of legislation would violate the terms of the settlement agreement, and noted that <br />another motion could be filed to seek a judicial ruling on that topic. <br /> <br />Additional background materials related to Docktown Marina can be found on the City’s <br />website: <br /> <br />http://www.redwoodcity.org/docktown <br /> <br /> <br />ANALYSIS <br />Summary of Vessels in Docktown <br /> <br />There are 67 vessels with Live Aboard Rental Agreements at Docktown Marina, 65 of <br />which are believed to be used as dwellings. Because access to each vessel has not been <br />granted, the exact status of the vessels is not known, however, there appear to be two <br />types of vessels: <br />6.1.B. - Page 14