My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2018-01-22 Joint SA PFA
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2018
>
AgdaPkt 2018-01-22 Joint SA PFA
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/24/2018 12:26:31 PM
Creation date
1/18/2018 1:21:49 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Joint
Agency Type
City Council and Successor Agency and Public Financing Authority
Date
1/22/2018
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
500
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
8.C. - Page 5 <br />San Carlos for the intent of development of biotech space. This further indicates <br />the increasing demand for biotech space in the mid -Peninsula. <br />• The development of Biotech R&D with lab space is more costly to construct when <br />compared to high tech office use and typically has similar rental rates. The <br />Biotech R&D concept under current zoning was estimated at 825,823 square <br />feet, smaller than the developer's office concept at 1,179,747 square feet. A <br />smaller project would result in reduced rental income. <br />• The economic report also includes a preliminary site assessment study prepared <br />by Sandis, an engineering firm (Attachment 3). This study provides a preliminary <br />review of how the proposed project would fit on the site and is not a final <br />environmental or engineering evaluation of the site development. Additional <br />engineering feasibility analysis will be conducted through the project and <br />environmental review process. <br />Communitv Benefits <br />In 2015, the City Council adopted the community benefits framework known as <br />"Partnership Redwood City". In addition to increasing fees to better offset the impacts <br />of development, the Council directed developers to include "onsite community <br />improvements", and/or fund other community needs when proposing larger scale <br />developments, particularly when General Plan amendments are proposed. Community <br />benefits could include, but are not limited to, contributions to affordable housing, <br />infrastructure improvements (beyond what is required to mitigate the development), as <br />well as funding for local non-profit agencies that provide services to Redwood City <br />residents. <br />During the July 24 General Plan Initiation there was significant Council and public <br />discussion regarding the developer's proposed community benefits package. The <br />developer's proposed community benefits package would contribute to various local <br />nonprofit causes and local infrastructure improvements. In order to be considered a <br />community benefit, the contribution would need to be in addition to mitigation measure <br />required in the EIR and impact fees required by the Municipal Code. Mitigation <br />measures and impact fees will be identified through the environmental and project <br />review process. <br />The developer proposes an onsite publically accessible trail next to Highway 101 as a <br />community benefit. However, the addition of this trail allows the developer to seek the <br />bonus Floor Area Ratio (FAR) allowed under Commercial Park zoning when <br />connections to the waterfront are constructed. This is not actually a waterfront trail as <br />the site is not San Francisco Bay -adjacent, but the trail could be used to walk to the <br />nearby waterfront. <br />Page 5of8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.