Agmt17 City of Menlo Park, Town of Atherton, and County of San Mateo MOU Bayfront Canal and Atherton Channel

Browse Search

COUNTYOF SAN MATEO DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS FLOOD RES ILIEN CEPROGRAM Exhibit A connects to Pond S5 of the South Bay Salt Pond Restoration Project. This alternative needs to be developed adequately to be considered in the environmental permitting process. Stakeholders • Project partners (the Collaborative): The Collaborative is composed of the City of Redwood City, City of Menlo Park, Town of Atherton, and the County of San Mateo. • Regulatory Stakeholders: Regulatory stakeholders who require permits include but are not limited to the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CAFWS), the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB), the US Army Corps of Engineers, the US Fish and .^Aldlife Services (USFWS), Caltrans, and the San Francisco Bay Conservation and Development Commission (BCDC). • Additional Stakeholders: Additional key stakeholders who have contributed to the evolution of the Project improvements include but are not limited to Cargill, Stanford University, Stanford Medical, the South Bay Salt Pond Restoration Project (SBSPRP), and the San Francisco Estuary Partnership (SFEP). Preliminary Design Workshop: The Collaborative hosted a Preliminary Design Workshop to validate and agree on the preferred design of the proposed Project. The Preliminary Design Workshop included planning, hydraulic, geotechnical, structural engineering, and environmental compliance resources from the County's On -Call Engineering Service Agreements. The goal of the Preliminary Design Workshop effort was to validate and optimize the proposed design and to ensure that it considers environmental permitting and operational limitations and conditions that may impact the life and resiliency of the Project. The following list summarizes the goals and outcomes of the workshop: o Review of existing conditions and Information. Summarize existing information and garner support for a comprehensive alternative to use in the environmental permitting process o Implementation strategy. Collaborate on most recent hydraulic model results and agree on an implementation approach that best meets the environmental compliance and permitting requirements for the preferred alternatives o Funding. Develop high level engineering cost estimate for the preferred alternative and a funding strategy, which explores and considers multiple sources of funding in additional to Capital and traditional sources of funding o Schedule. Develop a preliminary schedule that includes Local, Regional, State and Federal stakeholder updates at key milestones Following the Preliminary Design Workshop, a representative member from each jurisdiction of the Collaborative participated in the selection of the planning and design team. Regular Review Sessions will be held to incorporate stakeholder input and generate the most effective and resilient solution. Collaboration will take place through subject -specific workshops with Project owners and stakeholders. Scope: The scope of work for this Project is defined below. Representatives from the Collaborative will review and select consultants based on proposals submitted by planning, design, and environmental permitting teams from the County's On -Call Engineering Services Agreements to deliver the scope of services listed below. The Consultants will be responsible for validating and calibrating technical information and ensuring that the Project objectives, budget, and key milestones are met. 20171024 Boyfront_ExhibftA