Laserfiche WebLink
Public Comment: <br /> Terry Anderlini, representing Redwood Shore Homeowners Association, stated the <br /> Association opposes the eight-foot path and supports the 6~foot path. He stated that if widened <br /> it will destroy the serene environment and is an intrusion on the current status. He cited a <br /> safety issue with a conflict between pedestrians and bicyclists and secondary conflict with the <br /> County guidelines. He further expressed appreciation to the City for its consideration, but that <br /> in making it larger a danger and inconvenience exists. <br /> <br /> Patricia Dixon, representing Redwood Shores Owners Association, stated she supported Mr. <br /> Andeflini's remarks. She stated that during the tour she asked if the low spots where water <br /> collects could be fixed and was told they could and that they want the 6 feet paths. She further <br /> stated that during presentations the City stated there would be maintenance by the City and <br /> lots of landscaping and it is in poor condition as this time. <br /> <br /> Pete Hughes stated everyone is overwhelmingly in favor of the proposed multi-use eight feet <br /> wide paths along Bridge Parkway and Redwood Shores Parkway. He further stated that it <br /> seems like the opportunity to bring up the standards in the area. <br /> <br /> Bruce Finney stated that when he came to Redwood City and the Shores he was impressed by <br /> the forward thinking and planning of the city by the providing of multi-use paths that were in <br /> the eastern sections. He further stated that the older western areas addressed earlier have fallen <br /> into decay with dirt, mud and roots obliterating the path and creating hazards to the use. He <br /> stated the need to provide accessibility for all and that this method would meet that need. <br /> Other cities have been very successful with their well-maintained system and have had no <br /> problem with their mixed use. <br /> <br /> Carol Ford stated she walks everyday on the paths and thinks 6 feet is wide enough, the DG <br /> path improvements would be sufficient if the drainage is improved. Eight feet wide on Marine <br /> is too wide and is raised too high, the landscaping has not been improved and she expressed <br /> that the same would occur in this situation. She further stated that the asphalt is not a very <br /> environmentally friendly surface. <br /> <br /> Council comments included the desire for level pathways and the need for ease of navigation <br /> for those utilizing wheelchairs, walkers and strollers. More people will use the pathway if it is <br /> paved, but consideration should be given to the impact of the additional 18 inches to the <br /> landscaping. <br /> <br /> M/S Jordan/Howard to design the 8-foot paved path using funds provided by C/CAG and the <br /> 18-inch DG path to be bid as an alternate to see the specific costs and effects on the <br /> landscaping at the following Redwood Shores locations: <br /> <br /> 1) Bridge Parkway, between Redwood Shores Parkway and Bridge Parkway Bridge; <br /> 2) Redwood Shores Parkway from Bridge Parkway to Marlin Drive; <br /> <br /> The motion passed by a unanimous voice vote by those present with Council Member Ruskin <br /> absent. MINUTE ORDER 01-195 <br /> <br />REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING DECEMBER 10, 2001 <br />MINUTES PAGE 6 <br /> <br /> <br />