My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2002-02-25
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009 partial
>
2002
>
AgdaPkt 2002-02-25
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/5/2005 2:51:37 PM
Creation date
3/11/2002 7:47:01 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Agency Type
City Council
Date
2/25/2002
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
202
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
February 15, 2002 <br /> Issue #7-2002 <br /> <br /> Hot Bills <br />.. , . tO Watch LEGISI_~IIVE COUNSEL DEEMS AB 680 UNCONSTITUTIONAL <br />i A controversial bill that would redistribute sales tax within the Sacra- <br /> p.B 680 mento region may be unconstitutional, according to a Legislative Counsel <br />· (Steinberg). Land opinion released yesterday by Assemblyman Tim Leslie (R-Tahoe City). <br />· use: sales tax and <br />-' property tax AB 680 (Steinberg) passed out of the Assembly in late January with 41 <br />· m allocation, votes (a one-vote margin), over the ob,jections of the League, a number of <br />· individual cities and private sector interests, including several Sacramento- <br />· area cities and counties whose sales tax would be directly affected by the <br />· bill. The bill would reallocate the future growth in sales tax according to a <br />· specific formula: one-third allocated to thejurisdiction in which it was <br />· collected; one-third distributed regionally on a per-capita basis; and one- <br />· third returning to the city or county of origin providing that.jurisdiction was <br />· meeting various housing and planning requirements. For more, see page 3. <br /> <br />· LEAGUE DEVELOPS 2002 FEDERAL PRIORITY ISSUES <br /> <br />· As the 107th Congress begins their second year, the League is working <br />· with the National League of Cities, California city lobbyists and other appro- <br />· priate partners on a well-defined list of priorities. Key areas that have been <br /> Want more details on identified as priorities include homeland security, affordable housing, trans- <br />these and other bills? portation, and telecommunications and technology. For more, see page 4. <br />Log on to the League of <br />California Cities Web site, <br />at www. cacities, org and <br />click on Legislative <br />Advocacy. <br /> <br /> Page 2 · CALPERS BOARD MEMBERS All'END PUBLIC AGENCY MEETING <br /> Page 3 · LEGISLATURE PROPOSES HOUSING BOND FOR NOV. 2002 BALLOT <br /> Page 5 · OPPORTUNITIES FOR NLC CONVENTION GOERS <br /> Page 6 · LEGISLATIVE BILL SUMMARIES <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.