My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2002-01-28
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009 partial
>
2002
>
AgdaPkt 2002-01-28
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/5/2005 2:51:41 PM
Creation date
3/11/2002 9:12:16 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Agency Type
City Council
Date
1/28/2002
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
156
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ON THE COUNTYWIDE <br /> DEFICIENCY PLAN <br /> <br />1. Q- Does the budget for the Plan represent annual or total costs over the four-year <br /> period? A- Annual costs for each of the four years. <br /> <br />2. Q- Is a Deficiency Plan mandatory? A- Once a deficiency is determined by <br /> C/CAG, a Deficiency Plan is necessary, to either correct the deficiency or to <br /> improve overall system mobilit)~ and air quality. The Congestion Management <br /> Agency (C/CAG) has the responsibility to determine and approve the scope and <br /> breath of the Plan. <br /> <br />3. Q- If a Countywide Plan is adopted will local jurisdictions still be at risk of losing <br /> Proposition 111 funds if future deficiencies are discovered? A- The proposed <br /> Countywide Plan will cover all roadway Level of Service deficiencies currently <br /> identified and any new ones discovered for the next four years for all San Mateo <br /> County jurisdictions. <br /> <br />4. Q- What are the benefits of doing a Countywide Plan? A- There will be immunity <br /> from any penalties for the next four years; the proposed Plan has been designed to <br /> have a measurable impact on travel within the Count)'; the proposed Plan <br /> represents a coordinated approach with related elements that create a multiplier <br /> effect: there will be a great potential for leveraging other funds; a Countywide <br /> approach allows for the pooling of funds, sharing of resources, avoidance of <br /> duplication, reduction of administrative effort, and the resulting efficiencies and <br /> cost savings: there will be one Plan instead of eight plans where individual <br /> jurisdictions may have to participate in multiple plans; the proposed Plan will <br /> provide a stable funding source for many important Countywide programs: a <br /> Countywide Plan will have an overall net impact on Countywide mobility and <br /> allow for joint decision making among all local jurisdictions. <br /> <br /> 5. Q- Is the local service going back to the wa3' it was before Samtrans? A- No. First <br /> of all we recognize that in order to achieve effective Countywide bus service, it <br /> was necessary to pull back on some of the less cost-effective local routes. <br /> However there may be alternative ways of restoring some important service <br /> through means other than the traditional fixed-route bus routes. The local service <br /> element of the Plan is an attempt to encourage local creativity and flexibility in <br /> finding ways of meeting these needs by offering a pool of matching dollars to <br /> offset the cost of these experiments. <br /> <br /> 6. Q- Are cities expected to get into the transit business by providing local service? <br /> A- No. The cities are expected to have a significant role in defining the type and <br /> quantity of local transportation service that makes sense for its communit)'. They <br /> are also expected to pla)' a si~ificant role in defining the performance measures <br /> by which the success of the service would be measured. The Transit District, the <br /> Peninsula Congestion Relief Alliance, private contractors can do the actual <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.