Laserfiche WebLink
<br />'., ,~:'.'T" ,,~", ," ' <br />".':, , . <br />,'" ',' <br />'~ft.": '- .-, <br />:-10 <br /> <br />The main points which Mr. Bosch emphasized in his presentation involved <br />erosion, soil compaction, abusive use of the area by children and off~road <br />vehicles, dogs roaming throughout the park unleashed, the effects of poison <br />oak control and fire protection practices, the lack of full-time supervision <br />in the area, the lack of trails and pathways, points of access throughout the <br />park, the storm drain system in the park, the sanitary sewer system in the <br />park, and the vandalism. His main points of concern were that the public <br />abuse of the area is setting back the natural succession of the ecology in <br />the park. Also, the present practices of poison oak control and fire control <br />is having the same effect. He indicated that the stream is being polluted by <br />the storm drainage system and that there is a danger of raw sewage into the <br />park if the sanitary sewer system fails. He indicated that there had been <br />a disruption of the natural water table of the area resultant from the spray- <br />ing and fire protection practices together with the irrigation of the turf <br />area near Farm Hill Boulevard entrance. <br /> <br />Mr. Bosch suggested that the current planning and improvement program for <br />Stulsaft Park should be curtailed and that a Natural History Park Department <br />be formed and staffed with an ecologist, ,botanist, etc., in order to arrive <br />at the future of Stulsaft Park. He further suggested that there should be <br />a full-time supervisor of the park with arresting authority. He also su- <br />gested an in~depth study of the ecosystems in the park, a closing of the <br />entrances except for the Farm Hill Boulevard entrance, the construction of <br />a museum type facility rather than an information center, a rerouting of the <br />storm drain system, and controlled and planned restoration of the natural <br />plant life of the park. <br /> <br />Mr. Weeks was then called upon to comment on the Study as well as the back- <br />ground of the park. He pointed out that the City, the Parks & Recreation <br />Commission, and the staff were acutely aware of many problem areas which <br />were simply further identified in Mr. Bosch's report. It was further pointed <br />out that the upgrading and development of Stulsaft Park had been a matter of <br />discussion for many years. Decisions had been made many years ago that the <br />park would be made available for public use of the citizenry and would serve, <br />in pert, some neighborhood park needs together with a passive type of picnic <br />and day camp needs. It was also pointed out that decisions with respect to <br />utilizing the area for storm water drainage as~ell as sanitary sewer facil- <br />ities had been made and implemented. It was obvious that when houses were <br />built in the Farm Hill area as well as the other areas around Stulsaft Park <br />that the natural ecology of the area would be upset. It was pointed out that <br />the long-range plan for the improvement of the park would correct many of the <br />problems that currently exist and is designed to do so. The decisions to <br />develop the park as a municipal park, having a variety of recreational <br />uses yet hoping to maintain the more natural appearance, resulted in arriv- <br />ing at the scope-of-work for the park and had been approved by the Commission <br />and Council months ago. As time progresses, in-depth studies will be made of <br />specific issues if found to be feasible and related to the proposed develop~ <br />ment of the park. Mr. Weeks reviewed the background history of the park, the <br />elements of the master plan, and the progress of current working drawings for <br />the first stage <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />" .-..----------. <br />