Laserfiche WebLink
<br />%./4 <br /> <br />CB RICHARD ELLIS CONSULTING <br />Sedway Group <br /> <br />CBRE <br /> <br />CB RICHARD ELLIS <br /> <br />Mr. Larry Carr <br />September 15, 2005 <br />Page 2 <br /> <br />non-profit entity, this change would result in reduced property tax revenues for Redwood City as well <br />as other taxing agencies for the duration of Stanford's ownership. <br /> <br />For comparative purposes, the analysis assumes both an R&D and a traditional office tenant <br />scenario. The traditional office tenant scenario is conservative given existing and prospective central <br />San Mateo office and R&D market conditions 1. As of year-end 2004, the central San Mateo R&D <br />vacancy rate registered 15.9 percent compared to 19.6 percent for office. Despite the higher office <br />vacancy rate, it is anticipated that the central San Mateo County office market will have higher <br />average rental rates and will experience market recovery before the R&D market, which has <br />historically experienced low annual levels of absorption. <br /> <br />While the Stanford Hospital and Clinics use arguably will result in fewer tax revenues for Redwood <br />City, Stanford Hospital and Clinics employees, patients, and visitors will spend retail dollars in <br />Redwood City, which will help support the local economic base. The sales taxes from these <br />expenditures will directly benefit the City's General Fund. In addition, some non-local visitors to the <br />Hospital and Clinic will require overnight accommodations related to medical procedures, <br />generating transient occupancy taxes. There will be additional public benefits attributable to Stanford <br />that could further offset the loss of tax revenues to the City. Stanford seeks to analyze the effects of <br />occupancy of the site, from both a fiscal and economic perspective. This would include both the <br />fiscal revenue benefits as well as prospective economic benefits. This analysis quantitatively probes <br />these issues. <br /> <br />SUMMARY OF FINDINGS <br /> <br />The present value findings for the two comparative uses indicate that the R&D tenant is projected to <br />generate $2.6 million and the traditional office tenant is projected to generate $2.8 million in <br />revenues to the City of Redwood City General Fund over a 20-year period. In comparison, Stanford <br />Hospital and Clinics is projected to generate revenues of $2.9 million over 20 years. These results <br />indicate that any perception that the City of Redwood City is incurring an opportunity cost if the <br />Excite@Home space is transitioned to quasi-public use is unfounded. Instead, Stanford Hospital and <br />Clinics has the potential to outperform traditional office tenants with respect to local revenue <br />generation and the associated support of local City services through revenues flowing to the General <br />Fund. <br /> <br />In addition to strong local government revenue generation, Stanford Hospital and Clinics will directly <br />and indirectly make significant contributions to the economic base of Redwood City. This will occur <br />as a result of the local spending of employees, patients, and Stanford Hospital and Clinics itself. By <br />2008, when the medical facility will be fully operational for an entire year, local retail spending <br />attributable to the facility will total $2.7 million, comprising the following2: <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />$1.2 million in employee spending; and <br />$1.4 million in patient expenditures (includes retail spending and estimated room revenue). <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />These expenditures will serve to expand the local economic base of Redwood City, supporting local <br />businesses and in turn, local employment. Thus, not only will the government of Redwood City <br /> <br />, Cify of Redwood Cify is a submarket of the central San Mateo Counfy market. <br />2 May not total due to rounding. <br />