Laserfiche WebLink
<br />7/l-z/ <br /> <br />CB RICHARD ELLIS CONSULTING <br />Sedway Group <br /> <br />CBRE <br /> <br />C8 RICHARD ELLIS <br /> <br />Mr. Larry Carr <br />September 15, 2005 <br />Page 9 <br /> <br />examination of the expenditures, it is assumed that 60.0 percent, or $3.2 million, of the expenditures <br />represent annual transactions subject to use tax. It is assumed that 1.0 percent of these taxable sales <br />will flow to the City of Redwood City in the form of annual use tax revenues. While clinic operations <br />are not estimated to begin until start of 2008, expenditures are assumed to be required starting in <br />mid-2007 to ensure smooth operations and to appropriately equip the facility to meet patient needs. <br />These are conservative assumptions given they do not include local sales tax generated from <br />Stanford Hospital and Clinics spending within Redwood City. <br /> <br />Transient Occupancy Tax. Exhibit 6 details estimated transient occupancy tax revenues generated <br />by Stanford Hospital and Clinics patients. Stanford Hospital and Clinics estimates annual patient <br />visits totaling 188,262. It is estimated that patients residing outside the Greater San Francisco Bay <br />Area will generate 20.0 percent of the annual patient visits. The analysis assumes on average, 33 <br />percent of the patients from outside the Greater San Francisco Bay will require an overnight stay, <br />resulting in annual overnight patient stays of 9,413. CBRE Consulting conservatively estimates that <br />Redwood City hotels capture approximately 33 percent of the room demand, or 3,106 annual <br />overnight stays. CBRE Consulting estimates average Redwood City hotel room rates of $76 per night <br />(2008 dollars).l0 The estimated annual Redwood City room rate revenue totals $236,081 (2008 <br />dollars). This total room revenue will be subject to the transient occupancy tax of 10 percent paid to <br />the City of Redwood City. Therefore, 1O percent of the total of these annual room revenues, or <br />$23,608 (2008 dollars), will flow to the City of Redwood City in the form of annual transient <br />occupancy tax revenues. <br /> <br />CONCLUSIONS <br /> <br />Comparative Fiscal Revenues Analysis <br /> <br />The present value findings for the two comparative uses are displayed in the following table. These <br />findings are documented in Exhibits 7, 8, and 9, with the detailed analyses presented in Exhibits 1O, <br />11, and 12. Exhibit 14 presents the summary findings. As these findings indicate, the R&D tenant is <br />projected to generate $2.6 million in revenues to the City of Redwood City General Fund over a 20- <br />year period. The comparable figure for the traditional office tenants is $2.8 million. For both <br />tenants, revenues are derived largely from property taxes and sales taxes. Stanford Hospital and <br />Clinics use compares quite favorably to these figures with a 20-year revenue projection of $2.9 <br />million, or a figure slightly higher than the R&D user and equivalent to the traditional office tenant. <br /> <br />20-Year Discounted General Fund Revenue Analysis <br />2006 Dollars <br />Tenant 20-Year Present Value <br />R&D Tenant $2,552,116 <br />Traditional Office Tenant $2,815,183 <br />Stanford Hospital and Clinic $2,885,998 <br /> <br />These findings indicate that any perception that the City of Redwood City is incurring an opportunity <br />cost if the Excite@Home space is transitioned to medical facility use is unfounded. Instead, Stanford <br />Hospital and Clinics will likely slightly outperform the alternative R&D use of the building, and even <br /> <br />10 Refer to Exhibit 6 for explanation of average room rate. <br /> <br />