Laserfiche WebLink
<br />7/1. ~~ <br /> <br />CB RICHARD ELLIS CONSULTING <br />Sedway Group <br /> <br />CBRE <br /> <br />CB RICHARD ELLIS <br /> <br />Mr. Larry Carr <br />September 15, 2005 <br />Page 10 <br /> <br />match a more traditional office tenant, if allowable, with respect to local revenue generation and the <br />associated support of local City services through revenues accruing to the General Fund. <br /> <br />Select Stanford Hospital and Clinics Economic Impacts <br /> <br />In addition to strong local government revenue generation, Stanford Hospital and Clinics will directly <br />and indirectly make significant contributions to the economic base of Redwood City. This will occur <br />as a result of the local spending of employees and patients' 1. By 2008, when the medical facility will <br />be fully operational for an entire year, local retail spending attributable to the facility will total $2.7 <br />million (see Exhibit 13), comprising the following 12: <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />$1.2 million in employee spending; and <br />$1.4 million in patient expenditures (includes retail spending and estimated room revenue). <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />These expenditures will serve to expand the local economic base of Redwood City, supporting local <br />businesses and in turn, local employment. Thus, not only will the government of Redwood City <br />benefit from these expenditures because of their taxable retail sales generation potential (see <br />preceding section), but so too will the locally-owned businesses of Redwood City. <br /> <br />SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION <br /> <br />The analysis was conducted through a series of excel spreadsheets. These spreadsheets are attached <br />as exhibits to this letter report, included in Appendix A. All exhibits are fully documented regarding <br />type of assumption and source. The exhibit numbers and their contents are as follows: <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Exhibit 1: Relevant building addresses and current (2004) building value and property tax <br />payments. <br /> <br />Exhibit 2: Tax rate assumptions relevant to the properties, including the local property tax rate, <br />sales and use tax rate, and utility users' tax rate. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Exhibit 3: General assumptions for the two comparative uses, including rate of inflation, <br />municipal discount rate, stabilized occupancy, taxable sales generation, and utility rates. <br /> <br />Exhibit 4: Estimate of Stanford Hospital and Clinics construction related costs that are subject to <br />use tax. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Exhibit 5: Estimates of Stanford Hospital and Clinics annual expenditures with out-of-state <br />vendors that are taxable and subject to use tax, and associated use tax revenues generated for <br />Redwood City. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Exhibit 6: Estimate of transient occupancy tax generated by Stanford Hospital and Clinics <br />patients. <br /> <br />Exhibits 7, 8 & 9: Comparative 20-year present value General Fund revenue analysis for the <br />R&D tenant (Exhibit 7), traditional office tenant (Exhibit 8) and Stanford Hospital and Clinics <br />(Exhibit 9). <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />11 The analysis conservatively assumes no local Redwood City spending attributable to Stanford Hospital and <br />Clinics expenditures. <br />12 May not total due to rounding. <br />