My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2018-03-26 Joint SA PFA
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2018
>
AgdaPkt 2018-03-26 Joint SA PFA
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/5/2021 2:02:20 PM
Creation date
3/22/2018 4:45:26 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Joint
Agency Type
City Council and Successor Agency and Public Financing Authority
Date
3/26/2018
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
931
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City of Redwood City SSMP Audit Form Page 3 of 5 <br />YES NO <br />ELEMENT 5 – DESIGN AND PERFORMANCE STANDARDS <br />A. <br />Does the SSMP contain current design and construction standards for the <br />installation of new sanitary sewer systems, pump stations and other <br />appurtenances and for the rehabilitation and repair of existing sanitary <br />sewer systems? <br />□□ <br />B. <br />Does the SSMP document current procedures and standards for inspecting <br />and testing the installation of new sewers, pumps, and other <br />appurtenances and the rehabilitation and repair of existing sewer lines? □□ <br />ELEMENT 6 – OVERFLOW AND EMERGENCY RESPONSE PLAN <br />A. <br />Does the City’s Sanitary Sewer Overflow and Backup Response Plan <br />establish procedures for the emergency response, notification, and <br />reporting of sanitary sewer overflows (SSOs)? □□ <br />B. <br />Are Wastewater Division staff and contractor personnel appropriately <br />trained on the procedures of the Sanitary Sewer Overflow and Backup <br />Response Plan? □□ <br />C. <br />Considering performance indicator data in the Annual SSO Report, is the <br />Sanitary Sewer Overflow and Backup Response Plan effective in handling <br />SSOs in order to safeguard public health and the environment? □□ <br />ELEMENT 7 – FATS, OILS, AND GREASE (FOG) CONTROL PROGRAM <br />A. Does the Fats, Oils, and Grease (FOG) Control Program include efforts to <br />educate the public on the proper handling and disposal of FOG? □□ <br />B. <br />Does the City’s FOG Control Program identify sections of the collection <br />system subject to FOG blockages, establish a cleaning schedule and <br />address source control measures to minimize these blockages? □□ <br />C. <br />Are requirements for grease removal devices, best management practices <br />(BMP), record keeping and reporting established in the City’s FOG <br />Control Program? □□ <br />D. Does the City have sufficient legal authority to implement and enforce the <br />FOG Control Program? □□ <br />E. Is the current FOG program effective in minimizing blockages of sewer <br />lines resulting from discharges of FOG to the system □□ <br />ELEMENT 8 – SYSTEM EVALUATION AND CAPACITY ASSURANCE PLAN <br />A. <br />Does the Redwood City Sanitary Sewer Master Plan evaluate hydraulic <br />deficiencies in the system, establish sufficient design criteria and <br />recommend both short and long term capacity enhancement and <br />improvement projects? <br />□□ <br />B. <br />Does the City’s Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) establish a schedule of <br />approximate completion dates for both short and long-term improvements <br />and is the schedule reviewed and updated to reflect current budgetary <br />capabilities and activity accomplishment? <br />□□ <br />6.2.A. - Page 232
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.