My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2002-08-12
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009 partial
>
2002
>
AgdaPkt 2002-08-12
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/5/2005 2:53:46 PM
Creation date
8/8/2002 3:10:50 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Agency Type
City Council
Date
8/12/2002
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
88
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Redwood CitT, CA 94063-1655 <br /> <br /> Peggy Thompson " <br /> <br /> Court Executive Officer I~ ~.' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~Z (650) 599-1711 <br /> Clerk & Jm3., Commissioner FAX (650) 363-4698 <br /> <br /> May 20, 2002 <br /> <br /> City Council <br /> City of Redwood City <br /> 1017 Middlefield Road <br /> Redwood City, CA 94063 <br /> <br /> Re: Port of Redwood City Report <br /> <br /> Dear Councilmemberi: <br /> <br />The 2001-2002 Grand Jury filed a report on May 20. 2002 whicfi contains findings and recommendations pertaining <br />to your agency. Your agency must submit comments, within 90 days, to the Hon. Quentin L. Kopp. <br /> <br />As you are the public agency that has been commented upon by the Grand Jury, your comments are due no later <br />than August 19. 2002 to: <br /> <br /> Hon. Quentin L. Kopp <br /> Judge of the Superior Court <br /> Hall of Jnstice <br /> 400 County Center; 2'~ Floor <br /> Redwood City, CA 94063-1655. <br /> <br />For all responses, the responding person or entity shall indicate one of the following: <br /> <br /> 1. The respondent agrees with the finding. <br /> <br /> 2. The respondent disagrees wholly or partially with the finding, m which case the response shall specify <br /> the portion of the finding that is disputed and shall include an explanation of the reasons therefor. <br /> <br />Additionally, as to each Grand Jury finding, the responding person or entity shall report one of the following <br />actions: <br /> <br /> 1. The recommendation has been implemented, with a summary regarding the unPlemented action. <br /> <br /> 2. The recommendation has not yet been implemented, but will be unplemented m the future, with a lime <br /> frame for map]ementation. <br /> <br /> 3. The recommendation requu'es further analysis, with an explanation and the scope and parameters of an <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.