Laserfiche WebLink
FY 2000 Pvs~]c Po~.? 1~x~cz Gve'v~'~~ <br /> ...... Summa~ (U.S. Po~ O~) <br />~ can b~ seen in Figu~ ~, net ~n~me va~es ~ns~dembly amon9 regions, mng~ng ~m <br />-$2~ .3 m~]lion in ~e Nodh A~an~c to $~77.7 mi~[ion in ~e So~ Panic. ~n I~kin9 more <br />closely at the No~h A~antic to unde~nd why that ~gion alone e~enced an <br />aggregate net loss, we see ~at ~ur (~ s~) po~ m~ff~ net losses and ~ repoffed <br />minor p~. Contfibu~ng fa~om to net losses in ~is region am operating losses and <br />bond intem~ e~nses. <br />Con.st the above ~ith the South Pac~c region, where seven (of eight) po~s reposed <br />net in.me. In addition, six poffs shoed ope~ng pmf~. <br /> <br /> Fl~re 1 ~ 2000 N~ ~me ~y R~on) <br /> <br /> S. Atlantic <br /> Gulf' <br /> N. Pacific * <br /> S. Pacific ' <br /> Gt. Lakes <br /> -50 0 50 100 150 200 <br /> <br /> USS In Millions <br /> <br /> Figure 2 below compares operating revenues by region, distinguishing marine revenues <br /> from other types of operating revenues. Please note the importance of non-traditional <br /> sources of income to the North Atlantic, North Pacific, and Great Lakes. The North <br /> Pacific earns as much from non-traditional sources as from marine sources. <br /> <br /> Figure 7, 1~ 2000 Operating Revenues (By Region) <br /> <br /> 500 <br /> <br /> ~ 3s0. <br /> <br /> ~$0 <br /> =- 200 <br /> ~ '150 <br /> lO0 <br /> $0 <br /> <br /> ~ The Public Port Finance Survey was compiled by the American Association of Por[ Authorities or a member <br /> port for nearly 20 yee~ and the lest 4 yea~s by the Maritime Administration, <br /> =ports in U,S. territories (Puerto Rico, Satpan) are not included in this analysis. <br /> <br /> 1 <br /> <br /> <br />