My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2018-04-09 Joint SA PFA
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2018
>
AgdaPkt 2018-04-09 Joint SA PFA
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/10/2018 9:56:09 AM
Creation date
4/5/2018 11:39:15 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Joint
Agency Type
City Council and Successor Agency and Public Financing Authority
Date
4/9/2018
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
481
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
84MASTER VISIOn85curAtoriAl Vision <br />1. general Recommendations <br />• Allow planning time and budget for the selected artist to spend time in Redwood City to <br />better understand the people, city and context. <br />• Consider the city’s unique placement in the Bay Area and its central position to nature, the <br />bay, high tech industry, and residential communities. <br />• Honor the historic and ongoing diversity that Redwood City embraces. <br />• Recognize that Redwood City is also the county seat for San Mateo County. <br />• Relate to the environmental interests of the community including the park system, San <br />Francisco Bay Trail, Harbor. <br />• Recognize the diversity of scale of projects from budget, to size, to placement. <br />• Seek out projects that provide a big impact whether in central locations like downtown or the <br />unique and different neighborhood communities. <br />• Welcome and embody the values of the residents while also providing thought provoking and <br />timeless artworks. <br />2. Commissioning <br /> Although commissioned artworks are preferred, sometimes pre-existing artworks are equally appropriate <br />for permanent or temporary public artworks. In all cases, the proposed site and project should begin with <br />either a city staff need/idea or a CCC initiative. In all cases a steering committee should be formed with <br />appropriate community input to form the basis of the project. <br />Industry standard has since <br />bifurcated the RFQ/RFP process <br />into two separate stages. The belief <br />was that it was unfair for a city to <br />request ideas for free at the RFQ <br />stage and could open the city to law <br />suits. Templates for a standard RFQ <br />and RFP and flushed out examples <br />of each have been provided by Fung <br />Collaboratives for City staff to review <br />and modify as appropriate. <br />The call for artists (RFQ and RFP) <br />should be done electronically. The <br />CCC can request all applications to <br />be sent as a pdf to a designated city <br />staff person. Late entries should not <br />be accepted. If the CCC envisions multiple open calls within a year, platforms like Slideroom should be <br />considered. The annual fee is minimal ($1,200) and provides an organized and easy presentation mode for <br />any selection committee or viewer. All content is confidential and easy to access. Included is a current list <br />of sites to post national RFQ and RFP in the useful document section of the Master Vision. <br /> <br />3. Permanent <br />All eyes and attention go to permanent public art because they are designed to last the test of time. <br />Often cities rush and acquire artwork that is unsuitable for the site or that has no connection to the <br />people and place it was on view for. Removing permanent public art can be a difficult process, and <br />should absolutely be avoided. All permanent public art projects should have enough time for the <br />proper process to take place, giving time to ensure that an artwork is meaningful, relevant, timeless, <br />thought provoking, and desired by the community and visitors. The CCC review and oversight <br />process described in the Master Vision should always take place with the special steering committee <br />maintaining proper control. This process takes between two – four years on average. <br />Each new public artwork has its own needs, <br />so there exists no effective cookie cutter <br />approach. In some cases, a local artist may <br />be preferred or an outside artist preferred. <br />Each approach has its value. Regardless, <br />with proper support to either artist, an <br />amazing artwork should be the outcome. <br />The steering committee should seek out <br />fresh and different forms of expression. A <br />wall does not necessarily mean a mural but <br />rather could accommodate photography, <br />light, kinetic, projection, relief artwork or <br />even sculpture. Be imaginative in your <br />search! <br />It is obvious that ADA compliance, safety, <br />maintainability, and appropriateness are <br />all necessary but what can really set apart <br />Redwood City’s public art program is the <br />vision. Artists that can listen, communicate <br />and embed, produce an artwork that has <br />both personal and universal content and <br />appeal should be the benchmark during the <br />artist search. The search process can be an <br />open call, selection from a pre-registered <br />list, part of a recommended search list or <br />any combination of the above. The most <br />important thing is to find an artist that is <br />the right fit for the particular assignment. <br />The end goal is to have an artwork that <br />is authored by the artist, but in a way that <br />the artist does not impose their ideas on <br />the community. Rather, through mediating <br />proper dialogue with the right artist, the artist <br />can embrace the needs and aspirations of the community while expressing their own artist voice. The <br />committee, community and artists all need to be on the same page. Intentions, goals, and desires <br />should all be clearly defined at the time of contract signing. This allows the artist time to research and <br />create his or her conceptual ideas and evolve them over time until a final, detailed proposal is <br />created, reviewed and approved. <br />Redwood City residents want High Art – not decoration - and from a miscellany <br />of artists from the local to the foreign. The main priority is appropriateness and <br />intellectual and aesthetic quality. <br />It is equally important that the demographic of artists reflects that of Redwood City. The Bird Bath <br />and Fountain at the Jardin de Ninos Park is a great example of embracing and listening to the <br />local community. The only way the outdoor museum can be envisioned is by embracing artists with <br />different philosophies, backgrounds, aesthetics, and interests. The Arts are about conversation and <br />acceptance. <br />Colette CrutCHer & aileen barr redwood City <br />ante bulJan redwood City <br />8.A. - Page 48
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.