Laserfiche WebLink
b) The project complies with Chapter 30, Subdivisions, Article Xl, Section 30 regarding <br />condominiums. <br />Basis for finding: The project complies with the Municipal Code requirements <br />relating to the creation of condominiums <br />Section 7: Tentative Map (TM2014-12): In the exercise of its independent <br />judgement, the Commission finds that: <br />a) The map, design, or improvements of the proposed subdivision are consistent with <br />the general or specific plans, the zoning ordinance, or subdivision improvement <br />requirements. <br />Basis for finding: The proposed subdivision and associated improvements are <br />consistent with Redwood City's General Plan, Municipal Code, Zoning Ordinance, <br />as amended by the Waterfront Ordinance, and all applicable subdivision <br />improvement requirements. <br />b) The site is physically suited for the proposed type or density of development. <br />Basis for finding: The 7.88 acre project site is physically suited for the type and <br />density of the proposed development at a density of 17 dwelling units per acre. The <br />site is flat and located in an urban environment for which all public utilities and <br />services are already established. <br />c) The design or proposed improvements are not likely to cause substantial <br />environmental damage, or substantially and avoidably injure fish, wildlife, or their <br />habitat, or cause serious public health problems. <br />Basis for finding: The project site is currently entirely paved adjacent to the creek. <br />The proposed development will maintain sufficient setbacks from the creek to avoid <br />any impact to fish, wildlife or their habitat. The proposed development will improve <br />the site with new pervious area and new native landscaping. <br />d) The design or improvements of the proposed subdivision will not conflict with <br />essential public easements for access through, or use of, property within the <br />proposed subdivision, unless acceptable alternate public easements will be <br />provided. <br />Basis for finding: The proposed subdivision and associated improvements will not <br />conflict with essential public easements for access through, or use of, property within <br />the proposed subdivision. Additionally, the project site does not have any public <br />utilities or associated improvements that would be in conflict with the proposed <br />project. <br />e) The reasons submitted for the granting of any exceptions applied for comply with <br />requirements for findings described in Section 30.69, and the tentative map is <br />deemed not workable without the granting of such exceptions. <br />Basis for finding: No exceptions to the Subdivision Ordinance are requested. <br />f) Such other findings of conflict with written public policy or with the public interest as <br />the Planning Commission may determine. <br />Basis for finding: The proposed project does not conflict with any written public <br />policy or with the public interest. <br />ATTY/RESO.0027/PC RESO APPROVING PERMITS TO 1548 MAPLE STREET (STRADA) <br />REV: 04-13-18 PR <br />Page 4 of 22 <br />