Laserfiche WebLink
<br />consulted regarding EIR scope. The potential consultants would be provided with the work <br />products generated as set out in Tasks 1, 2 and 3. We would also prepare a detailed and <br />definitive Project Description based on final guidance from the City regarding what project <br />scenarios should be evaluated in the document. We would assist with selection of a consultant if <br />requested by providing written review and comparison of the inputs from each consultant. <br /> <br />Task 5: Participate in Meetings as Requested, Read and Comment on the ADEIR, <br />Assist in Formulating a Cost Recovery Ordinance for the Precise Plan EIR, <br />and Complete Other Tasks as Assigned. <br /> <br />Since the original proposal for services was completed in Septel)1ber, it has become clear that there <br />may be a variety of small, brief, but helpful meetings and tasks that we can assist with. All of these <br />tasks are likely to be small, briefly executed, but important. For this task then, we have included a <br />general statement that we are willing to assist with any steps in the process toward completion of the <br />Precise Plan that the City staff thinks is warranted. <br /> <br />We would propose assisting as well with the typical steps taken in managing preparation of a large <br />scale Program EIR. The basic goal would be to produce a Program EIR with a detailed suite of <br />mitigation measures acceptable to the City's primary planning and downtown staff. Typical steps in this <br />process would involve getting consultant questions answered in a timely manner, reading chapters as <br />they are completed or reading the screen check document in its totality, providing comments and <br />direction which protect the vision of the Precise Plan, guiding the document through public review and <br />response to comments and ensuring that these steps are taken without creating undue delays on the <br />Precise Plan adoption process. We would also recommend some adjustments to the City's CEQA <br />Guidelines to provide for specific direction regarding subsequent environmental analysis for Precise <br />Plan developments. This process may involve limited work with the City Attorney. We have also <br />encouraged a full cost recovery CEQA process which would include an "environmental review" fee <br />structure in the Precise Plan document itself designed to reimburse the City for the preparation of the <br />Precise Plan EIR. <br /> <br />Preparation Time and Costs <br /> <br />Based on comparable projects in other jurisdictions, with the exception of the increment of <br />change table, we anticipate that these tasks can be completed within several months and at a <br />cost not to exceed $15,000. <br /> <br />The increment of change table could be a substantial undertaking but the scope of work and <br />costs necessary to produce this "pre-EIR" deliverable cannot be fully ascertained without <br />reviewing the status of available data. This step has been initiated with Freedman, Tung and <br />Bottomley staff and it appears much of the baseline data necessary for the "increment of change <br />table" is in place and can successfully be converted for use in the EIR. <br /> <br />Respectfully, <br /> <br />Steve Craig <br />President <br />The Planning Corporation <br /> <br />Precise Plan Proposal Page 4 <br />