AgdaPkt 2018-05-07 Joint SA PFA - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

ATTY/RESO.0035/CC RESO CERTIFYING FINAL EIR – 1548 MAPLE REV: 04-30-18 PR Page 9 of 49 appropriate mitigation measures, and the City shall be responsible for monitoring implementation of the mitigation measures. Upon completion of the selected mitigations, a report documenting the methods and findings shall be prepared and submitted to the City for review, which shall ensure that the provisions of the Treatment Plan have been met. The final report shall be submitted to the Northwest Information Center at Sonoma State University. Significant archaeological materials shall be submitted to an appropriate local curation facility and used for future research and public interpretive displays, as appropriate. CUL-2c: Should an archaeological deposit be encountered during project subsurface construction activities when an archaeological monitor is not on site, all ground-disturbing activities within 25 feet shall be redirected and a qualified archaeologist meeting the Secretary of the Interior’s Professional Qualifications Standards for Historic Archeology contacted to assess the situation, determine if the deposit qualifies as a historical resource, consult with agencies as appropriate, and make recommendations for the treatment of the discovery. If the deposit is found to be significant (i.e., eligible for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources), the applicant shall be responsible for funding and implementing appropriate mitigation measures. Mitigation measures may include recordation of the archaeological deposit, data recovery and analysis, and public outreach regarding the scientific and cultural importance of the discovery. Upon completion of the selected mitigations, a report documenting methods, findings, and recommendations shall be prepared and submitted to the City for review, and the final report shall be submitted to the Northwest Information Center at Sonoma State University. Significant archaeological materials shall be submitted to an appropriate local curation facility and used for future research and public interpretive displays, as appropriate. Finding: Implementation of Mitigation Measures CUL-2a, CUL-2b and CUL-2-c would reduce project-related impacts to archaeological deposits and historic-period archaeological deposits to a less-than-significant level. Facts in Support of Finding: These mitigation measures establish processes in line with best management practices to alert construction contractors to the sensitivity of the project site to for buried archaeological deposits, for monitoring by an archaeologist during subsurface construction, and for an action plan should archaeological deposits be found. TRANSPORTATION AND CIRCULATION Impact TRA-1: Development of the proposed project and the project variant would add traffic to Broadway/Woodside Road (SR 84)/US 101 Southbound Off-Ramp (Intersection #6), which currently operates at LOS F in the AM peak hour under Existing conditions, and would increase vehicle delay at this intersection by more than the five-seconds. Mitigation TRA-1: The project applicant shall pay to retime and optimize the traffic signals at Broadway/Woodside Road (SR 84)/US 101 Southbound Off-Ramp. Since Caltrans controls this intersection, the project applicant would need to coordinate with the City and Caltrans to implement the mitigation measure. Finding: Implementation of Mitigation Measure TRA-1 would reduce the project- related impact of an increase in vehicle delay by more than five seconds to Intersection #6 to a less-than-significant level. 7.A. - Page 46