Laserfiche WebLink
3 no informed opinion, but more people also costs in increased communication overheads, and <br />time to reach concensus <br />3 1 would want to know the affiliation and backgrounds of members to understand their individual <br />voting to see if it really is a diverse panel of thinkers and decision makers or not as I haven't been <br />happy with the development and infrastructure and feel they just approve every building <br />opportunity without thinking of impact to community <br />3 I'd want to see more facts to support 7 council members <br />3 = I don't have enough information to know how many people is required on the council, I would <br />need to understand the spicy role and the value each member adds to the council, @ <br />3 Hard because more members means more voices and hopefully better advocacy. However, if it's <br />more of the status quo, then what's the point in having 7. Save money and reduce to 5 <br />3 neutral, I think it would be good to have a greater diversity however I do believe that saving <br />money and budgeted areas and not having redundancy is also as important. As a compromise I <br />would suggest that we have an even number of 6 city council members and no more and no less <br />© 2018 Voca Advocacy Inc, Redwood City, California <br />