Laserfiche WebLink
3. We need more housing but CEQA is being ignored in too many cases <br />3. 1 usually think that the recommendations of the Planning Commission should be followed. But I <br />don't know how "inadequate" the study was. I'd say a larger percentage of affordable units is <br />desirable. <br />3 Would support smaller(5 story) with more affordable, 19 doesn't do enough <br />3 support if it will be truly affordable housing but doubt it <br />3 If it really is affordable then yes. I have a problem believing rents won't be in the thousands though. <br />3. Don't have enough info <br />3. Not enough info provided to make an intelligent decision. We need facts to make good voting <br />decisions <br />3 More affordable units would seem appreciate. Thought this was to be a senior targeted units <br />3 1 can either way. We do need more affordable housing and hoping more than 19 <br />3. There is already a similar building in the area and its not in my area of the city so why not. With that <br />attitude 1 should run for city council. I just wonder when we hit "maximum occupancy" for the city. <br />Also we do things assbackwards by creating an overcrowding issue and then try to address <br />infrastructure. <br />IIIII II II _ I W III I i III11 11 I Id i.___ II <br />© 2018 Voca Advocacy Inc, Redwood City, California <br />