My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2018-05-21 Joint SA PFA
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2018
>
AgdaPkt 2018-05-21 Joint SA PFA
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/22/2018 3:10:38 PM
Creation date
5/17/2018 5:10:42 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Joint
Agency Type
City Council and Successor Agency and Public Financing Authority
Date
5/21/2018
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
725
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
1. Redwood City has built and is building so much housing already. Where is the water coming from? <br />What about the traffic? It needs to stop at some point. The housing market will collapse and we will <br />have ruined our city on the mean time. <br />1 Would support if they put appt at rents between 1200 and 2400 dollars for our low wage workers <br />1. The reason I oppose it is because city council has not planned well for growth in the past. That is <br />evident by the apparent lack of duffivie <br />2 We need more affordable housing and supporting infrastructure for all new developments <br />1 -No, too many apt buildings. I don't even recognize downtown RWC anymore. The traffic & parking <br />are already horrendous. My water bill is already through the roof. I'm very fearful what will happen <br />with all the new population. Water is a finite resource. As it is, my family, friends & I avoid downtown <br />RWC at all costs. It's a nightmare! <br />2. Redwood City is more than crowded. Its overbuilt with ugly 8 story block size & expensive <br />behemoths. Our city is now horribly Congested (exactly what envionmentalists predicted, prior to this <br />building boom) Traffic is a nightmare & our quality of life here has diminished. Blocking off & <br />narrowing streets for "traffic calming" makes maters worse. The token amount of low income housing <br />being included is pitifully inadequate. It wont achieve a meaningful impact on the housung <br />imbalance we have. There should be a set formula of at least 25% low income included for all new <br />construction. Additional low income units should be required in all multi unit Building remodels to <br />replace the ones lost.. <br />1. Does anyone else notice what is happening downtown? Perhaps a tap on the brakes is called for. <br />Neutral/don't know: <br />+3 3 approve if affordable housing is increased to at least 33%, and an additional 33% of units <br />affordable to mid -tier affordable -for -non -tech -professionals. We already have substantial luxury level <br />housing for those families making more than $200K annually, and we are in dire need of more <br />housing for working and middle class families. <br />+2 3 - I'm not sure why this is useful poll question. We're residents, not the planning commission. We <br />don't have the full context here. I'm suspicious why an organization based in Irving CA has submitted <br />a letter about a project in Redwood City. <br />3 I'd like to knowwhat the environmental issues are. Without that info, 1 can't agree or disagree <br />knowledgeably. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.