My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2018-05-21 Joint SA PFA
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2018
>
AgdaPkt 2018-05-21 Joint SA PFA
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/22/2018 3:10:38 PM
Creation date
5/17/2018 5:10:42 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Joint
Agency Type
City Council and Successor Agency and Public Financing Authority
Date
5/21/2018
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
725
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
2 how much parking is being built as well that's the real problem with development in Rc <br />1 No mention of parking for these 125 units, it seems irresponsible to me. <br />219 is not enough affordable units <br />1 we need affordable housing this will not address this issue. To add to that we need to fix the <br />infrastructure before we add more housing. <br />2 oppose because 1) there aren't enough "affordable" units, should be a 1/4 of the total units = 31 and 2) <br />PWC is feeling very over crowded, just because you build these units near Caltrain doesn't mean those <br />people will use it, EI Camino use to be a quick way to get around, now it's a parking lot. Cars are <br />backed up at Green lights and by the time you get up to the front it's Red. <br />1. Traffic is bad enough and we don't have enough grocery stores to support more people. A Safeway <br />employee was telling me they don't know how they'll handle the residents when the apartment <br />building across from them opens up. <br />1 - I support the appeal purely because I feel projects of this magnitude should be heard by Council -- <br />instead of a Planning Commission that has no teeth. Why are our elected officials taking <br />responsibility for these projects like every other City on the peninsula? <br />2 ---my concern is that for a 125 unit building, how do you only offer 19 affordable housing --- and what <br />is considered "affordable"... rents are already way too high <br />1- For pretty obvious reasons of over development and very little regard for the impact this is having <br />and will have on our city, our quality of life as current residents and our environment. <br />1 to much building. Not enough affordable housing <br />1 - no resident wants this. RWC is overwhelmed with construction, we need a moratorium and think <br />about what is being approved. <br />1 It would be nice if the developers would naturally add more than the 15% the City requires. 15% of <br />125 is 18.75, which 19 units is the bare minimum the development has to provide. It seems paltry in <br />the larger landscape of our housing crisis. <br />1! Downtown Redwood City has reached capacity! There is enough high density housing in that area! <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.