Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />Preliminary fee results will be presented to City staff for their review, and comments will be <br />incorporated into the final fee results. In our experience, at least two rounds of fee calculation <br />and review are typically required before consensus is reached, and that level of effort is <br />included in the cost estimate. <br /> <br />The RFP indicates that equity issues for developers will need to be addressed for fees that have <br />already been paid versus future payments if significant fee adjustments occur because of: 1) <br />land use revisions, and/or 2) revised cost estimates. Determining the exact effect of land use <br />changes on the fee program will be difficult and the effect will likely be limited. The greater effect <br />will occur from revised cost estimates and the potential removal of the Woodside Road widening <br />projects. It is possible that all of the changes will offset one another. We proposed to review the <br />change in fees and consult with city staff as to how any discrepancies might be quantitatively <br />addressed within the proposed study budget. The preliminary results of the fee update will be <br />presented to a group of stakeholders (i.e., developers) prior to completion of the draft report. <br /> <br />Task 11-4 - Evaluate Fee Variations/Exemptions/Credits <br /> <br />The original fee program based the TIF on the total number of planned dwelling units (except for <br />the Redwood Shores area) including the Downtown core. When new Downtown uses were <br />exempted from the fee in 2003, the per trip fee was not adjusted and the overall revenue stream <br />was diminished. This ordinance amendment was deemed acceptable to foster Downtown <br />economic development. To address the effect of the Downtown exemption on the fee structure <br />to date, we will identify the amount of revenue that was not collected since the exemption was <br />enacted, and the amount that may be exempted through July 1, 2006. City staff will provide <br />development data. We will also review the principles of the Downtown Precise Plan in <br />evaluating the exemption and recommending the extension of it and the corresponding duration. <br />Information on potential fee reductions to account for lower vehicle trip generation in the <br />downtown core because of mixed-use and transit accessibility will also be provided. <br /> <br />As part of this task, we will craft policy language on the application of a fee credit allowance for <br />recently occupied land uses and conversion of land uses. We have researched this practice in <br />other jurisdictions and will identify issues associated with a change in tenants or use. <br /> <br />Task 11-5 - Documentation <br /> <br />In addition to the technical memoranda described in the tasks above, we will document our <br />analysis in a fee study report, which will be submitted to City staff for review and comment. A <br />total of 10 copies of the draft report will be provided. Following receipt of comments, we will <br />update the report for presentation to the City Council, and submit 10 copies of the final plus an <br />electronic version of the report in PDF format. This scope does not anticipate changes to the <br />project list as part of City review of the report. <br /> <br />Task 11-6 - Meetings <br /> <br />We will attend up to three project-level meetings, one stakeholder meeting, and one meeting of <br />the Council as part of this work scope. The stakeholder meeting will be scheduled once staff <br />has agreed to a draft version of the fee program. Attendance at additional meetings will be <br />accommodated with an amendment to the budget. <br /> <br /> <br />6 <br /> <br />fp <br /> <br />I-lilR & PEEn <br />