Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />recommend using already available data to update the analysis of existing traffic conditions in <br />the City to identify existing deficiencies. Substantial data is available, including most of the <br />major study intersections and roadway segments within the City, from previous studies <br />conducted over the last several years. We have some of this data from recent transportation <br />studies, and will ask the City to provide any additional data they may have. This data will be <br />analyzed and the resulting Levels of Service (LOS) compared to the City's standards in order to <br />determine existing deficiencies. <br /> <br />The City will provide a list of capital improvement projects to be included in the updated TMF <br />program. The TIF project list will include improvements identified as necessary mitigations in <br />previous traffic studies, or specified in the City's Capital Improvement Program or other planning <br />documents. The RFP notes the potential removal of the Woodside Road widening projects from <br />the fee program due to Caltrans review issues and City transportation and livability goals. <br />Several other projects to enhance non-automobile modes (i.e., transit, bicycle, and pedestrian <br />systems) have been identified and could be added to the list. Inclusion of these projects is <br />reasonable in that they provide additional person-capacity to accommodate transportation <br />demand from new development, provide opportunities to reduce congestion, and enhance the <br />overall transportation system. Fehr & Peers is well suited to investigate new alternative mode <br />projects given our extensive experience with bicycle, pedestrian, and bicycle planning <br />throughout the San Francisco Bay Area. These projects will focus on gap closures and <br />improved connections to minimize conflicts with vehicles (e.g., separate paths through <br />interchanges). <br /> <br />Nolte Associates, with assistance from Fehr & Peers staff, will review the cost estimates for <br />projects identified in the original TIF and develop conceptual cost estimates for new projects <br />identified in Task 11-2. Cost estimates will be developed using current standard unit costs based <br />on schematic designs and will include standard contingencies. <br /> <br />If any of the identified projects address a location that is currently not meeting the City's LOS <br />standards (Le., a location that is an existing deficiency), then the cost share attributable to new <br />development will be calculated and included in the fee program. For all other improvements, all <br />of the project cost will be included in the fee program. The roadway improvement projects will <br />be incorporated into the C/CAG model where appropriate. The list of projects and associated <br />cost estimates will be presented to staff in a technical memorandum. <br /> <br />Task 11-3 - Nexus Analysis <br /> <br />After the roadway network and land use assumptions have been reviewed with staff, we will use <br />the C/CAG model to determine the amount of peak hour traffic on each of the improved facilities <br />that is generated by development in Redwood City as compared to development outside of <br />Redwood City. The traffic contribution from development outside Redwood City will be <br />reviewed in collaboration with the City Attorney to determine whether it is "de minimus" (in which <br />case, the need for the improvement can be considered to be caused entirely by Redwood City <br />growth). If the model results indicate that some improvements serve a large percentage of <br />regional traffic, then the cost share attributable to new development in Redwood City will be <br />calculated for inclusion in the fee program. <br /> <br />The total cost to be funded by new development will then be spread over the number of DUEs <br />calculated from the land use projections to determine the fee for each land use category. <br /> <br /> <br />5 <br /> <br />fp <br /> <br />hlIR.& Pu:n <br />